DatingDapp
First Flight #33
Beginner FriendlyFoundrySolidityNFT
100 EXP
View results
Previous Next
Submission Details
Severity: low
Invalid

Lack of Age Restriction in `SoulBoundProfileNFT::mint`

parmakhanm786

Vulnerability Details

The function does not validate the age parameter, allowing unrealistic or inappropriate values.

Impact

Users can create profiles with invalid ages, which may lead to misuse or misrepresentation.

Tools Used

Manual

Recommendations

function mintProfile(string memory name, uint8 age, string memory profileImage) external {
require(profileToToken[msg.sender] == 0, "Profile already exists");
+ require(age > 18);
uint256 tokenId = ++_nextTokenId;
_safeMint(msg.sender, tokenId);
​
// Store metadata on-chain
_profiles[tokenId] = Profile(name, age, profileImage);
profileToToken[msg.sender] = tokenId;
​
emit ProfileMinted(msg.sender, tokenId, name, age, profileImage);
}
​
Updates

Appeal created

n0kto Lead Judge 4 months ago
Submission Judgement Published
Invalidated
Reason: Non-acceptable severity
Assigned finding tags:

invalid_URI_injection_scam_underaged_bad_name_photo_etc

Scamming/phishing is not the protocol problem, that's a user mistake. NFT are unique, even if someone does a copy of your profile (which is also possible in web2), I consider it informational. Injection is a problem for the web2 part of the protocol, not a bug here. For the age, it depends on the countries law and future medicine. Anyways, that's more an ethical/political problem, not a bug.

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.