Details:
The contract imports the EnumerableSet library; however, upon inspection, none of its functions or utilities are utilized within the contract's logic. This unused import adds unnecessary code without providing any functional benefits.
Root Cause:
The developer imported EnumerableSet potentially with the intention to use its functionality for managing sets but never implemented any operations that require it. This may have been an oversight or a remnant from an earlier version of the contract.
Impact:
Severity: Low
Implications:
Slightly increases the contract’s bytecode size, potentially leading to higher deployment costs.
Can cause confusion during audits and future maintenance as it suggests that there might be unused or incomplete logic related to set management.
No direct security vulnerabilities arise from this unused import.
Recommendation:
Remove the unused EnumerableSet import statement (and any related declarations if present) to streamline the contract. This will reduce the code footprint, lower deployment costs, and improve overall code clarity.
Proof of Concept:
Code Inspection:
Search the contract source for any usage of EnumerableSet functions (e.g., add, remove, contains).
Confirm that apart from the import statement, there are no references to EnumerableSet in the contract.
Compilation Test:
Remove the import statement and recompile the contract.
Verify that the contract compiles successfully without any errors or missing dependency issues.
This confirms that EnumerableSet is not required for the current contract functionality.
Please read the CodeHawks documentation to know which submissions are valid. If you disagree, provide a coded PoC and explain the real likelihood and the detailed impact on the mainnet without any supposition (if, it could, etc) to prove your point.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.