Summary
borrowing through the borrow() function results in flawed management of debt tokens and the lendingpool's scaledDebtBalance values
Vulnerability Details
function borrow(uint256 amount) external nonReentrant whenNotPaused onlyValidAmount(amount) {
if (isUnderLiquidation[msg.sender]) revert CannotBorrowUnderLiquidation();
UserData storage user = userData[msg.sender];
uint256 collateralValue = getUserCollateralValue(msg.sender);
if (collateralValue == 0) revert NoCollateral();
ReserveLibrary.updateReserveState(reserve, rateData);
_ensureLiquidity(amount);
uint256 userTotalDebt = user.scaledDebtBalance.rayMul(reserve.usageIndex) + amount;
if (collateralValue < userTotalDebt.percentMul(liquidationThreshold)) {
revert NotEnoughCollateralToBorrow();
}
uint256 scaledAmount = amount.rayDiv(reserve.usageIndex);
(bool isFirstMint, uint256 amountMinted, uint256 newTotalSupply) = IDebtToken(reserve.reserveDebtTokenAddress).mint(msg.sender, msg.sender, amount, reserve.usageIndex);
IRToken(reserve.reserveRTokenAddress).transferAsset(msg.sender, amount);
user.scaledDebtBalance += scaledAmount;
reserve.totalUsage = newTotalSupply;
ReserveLibrary.updateInterestRatesAndLiquidity(reserve, rateData, 0, amount);
_rebalanceLiquidity();
emit Borrow(msg.sender, amount);
}
when a user borrows through the borrow() function, the amount intended for borrowing is scaled. however, if it is the user's first loan, the debttoken's mint() function issues tokens without applying scaling, while the user.scaleddebtbalance is updated with the scaled amount, resulting in a discrepancy
function mint(
address user,
address onBehalfOf,
uint256 amount,
uint256 index
) external override onlyReservePool returns (bool, uint256, uint256) {
if (user == address(0) || onBehalfOf == address(0)) revert InvalidAddress();
if (amount == 0) {
return (false, 0, totalSupply());
}
uint256 amountScaled = amount.rayDiv(index);
if (amountScaled == 0) revert InvalidAmount();
uint256 scaledBalance = balanceOf(onBehalfOf);
bool isFirstMint = scaledBalance == 0;
uint256 balanceIncrease = 0;
if (_userState[onBehalfOf].index != 0 && _userState[onBehalfOf].index < index) {
balanceIncrease = scaledBalance.rayMul(index) - scaledBalance.rayMul(_userState[onBehalfOf].index);
}
_userState[onBehalfOf].index = index.toUint128();
uint256 amountToMint = amount + balanceIncrease;
_mint(onBehalfOf, amountToMint.toUint128());
emit Transfer(address(0), onBehalfOf, amountToMint);
emit Mint(user, onBehalfOf, amountToMint, balanceIncrease, index);
return (scaledBalance == 0, amountToMint, totalSupply());
}
when debt tokens are minted, the code shows that for a user's first loan, because _userstate[onbehalfof].index is 0, the tokens are issued without scaling. in summary, while the lendingpool increments the user.scaleddebtbalance with a scaled amount, the debt contract mints tokens without scaling for initial loans.
Impact
a discrepancy arises between the lendingpool's debt data and the number of debt tokens
Tools Used
code review
