Core Contracts

Regnum Aurum Acquisition Corp
HardhatReal World AssetsNFT
77,280 USDC
View results
Submission Details
Severity: medium
Valid

Stale price not being checked

Summary

price not being checked if stale

Vulnerability Details

I don't see anywhere where the `price` is being checked for being stale, this is very important

https://github.com/Cyfrin/2025-02-raac/blob/main/contracts/core/tokens/RAACNFT.sol#L32-L50

function mint(uint256 _tokenId, uint256 _amount) public override {
uint256 price = raac_hp.tokenToHousePrice(_tokenId);
if(price == 0) { revert RAACNFT__HousePrice(); }
if(price > _amount) { revert RAACNFT__InsufficientFundsMint(); }
// transfer erc20 from user to contract - requires pre-approval from user
token.safeTransferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), _amount);
// mint tokenId to user
_safeMint(msg.sender, _tokenId);
// If user approved more than necessary, refund the difference
if (_amount > price) {
uint256 refundAmount = _amount - price;
token.safeTransfer(msg.sender, refundAmount);
}
emit NFTMinted(msg.sender, _tokenId, price);
}

Impact

stale prices can lead to taking advantage of the system

Tools Used

manual

Recommendations

check for stale prices

Updates

Lead Judging Commences

inallhonesty Lead Judge 7 months ago
Submission Judgement Published
Validated
Assigned finding tags:

LendingPool::getNFTPrice or getPrimeRate doesn't validate timestamp staleness despite claiming to, allowing users to exploit outdated collateral values during price drops

inallhonesty Lead Judge 7 months ago
Submission Judgement Published
Validated
Assigned finding tags:

LendingPool::getNFTPrice or getPrimeRate doesn't validate timestamp staleness despite claiming to, allowing users to exploit outdated collateral values during price drops

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.

Give us feedback!