Vyper Vested Claims

First Flight #34
Beginner FriendlyDeFi
100 EXP
View results
Submission Details
Severity: medium
Invalid

Potential for Reentrancy Attacks

Summary

Although the contract does not appear to call external contracts that could lead to reentrancy in the typical sense (e.g., callback functions from ERC-20 transfer), there is always a potential risk in smart contracts where external calls are made. A reentrancy attack could occur if the ERC-20 token implementation is not secure or if a malicious user creates an exploitable scenario.

Vulnerability Details

Impact

Tools Used

Recommendations

Ensure that the ERC-20 token contract being interacted with is well-audited and does not have any reentrancy vulnerabilities. Additionally, consider following the checks-effects-interactions pattern (although this contract does mostly follow this), ensuring that state updates occur before external calls.

Updates

Appeal created

bube Lead Judge 4 months ago
Submission Judgement Published
Invalidated
Reason: Incorrect statement

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.