Snowman.solEven assuming that appropriate access control (as recommended in [H-3]) is implemented for the mintSnowman function, the contract currently lacks any further mechanisms to control the rate or frequency at which NFTs can be minted. There are no daily quotas, per-wallet mint limits within a specific timeframe, or other throttling mechanisms in place.
While access control prevents unauthorized parties from minting, an authorized address (e.g., the contract owner or an admin) could still mass-mint an excessive number of NFTs in a single transaction or through rapid, repeated calls. This can lead to:
1. Resource Spikes: Large minting events can cause significant gas usage spikes, potentially leading to network congestion and higher transaction fees during peak times.
2. Uncontrolled Distribution: Without emission controls, it becomes challenging to manage the gradual distribution or supply of tokens over time. This can hinder long-term project planning, community building, or value appreciation strategies (e.g., absence of vesting or drip mechanisms).
3. Abuse by Authorized Party/Compromise: If an admin key were compromised, or even due to negligence from the owner, an extremely large number of tokens could be minted very quickly, potentially devaluing the collection or causing market instability.
**Malicious scenario : **
A privileged user (or attacker with compromised key) executes:
Introduce specific rate-limiting or emission control mechanisms into the mintSnowman function, tailored to the project's economic goals, distribution strategy, and desired level of decentralization. Common approaches include:
* Per-Transaction Limit: Restrict the amount parameter to a reasonable maximum number of NFTs that can be minted in a single call.
* Per-Wallet/Global Daily/Weekly Limits: Implement mappings (mapping(address => uint256) public s_mintsPerDay;) and/or global counters to track and limit minting activity over specific time periods, resetting periodically.
* Timestamp-Based Throttling: Use block.timestamp to enforce cooldowns between minting operations for specific addresses or globally.
* Tiered Access/Vesting: For more complex distribution, consider tiered access or vesting schedules.
Example (combining with [H-3] and [H-5] mitigations):
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.