Normal behavior:
The contract updates state before making external calls, which is good practice and prevents most reentrancy attacks. However, the contract does not use OpenZeppelin's ReentrancyGuard, which is a standard and widely adopted protection against reentrancy.
Issue:
If the contract is extended in the future, or if a non-standard token is used, reentrancy could become a risk. Without ReentrancyGuard, a future developer may inadvertently introduce a vulnerability.
Likelihood:
Low in current implementation, but may increase with future changes or non-standard tokens.
Impact:
Potential for reentrancy attacks, leading to loss of funds.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.