Root + Impact

The function relies on hardcoded constants (401, 100) instead of named parameters or configuration values. Developers may misconfigure reward calculations during updates, causing unintended payout ranges.

Description

• Normal behavior: The reward calculation should use clearly defined constants for transparency and maintainability.

• Issue: The function uses hardcoded numbers (401, 100, 500) directly in the logic. These "magic numbers" lack context and make the contract harder to audit, maintain, and upgrade. More importantly, they obscure the intended reward range and could introduce inconsistencies if later modified in multiple places.

Risk

Likelihood:

• Reason 1 High chance of introducing errors if values need to be updated

• Reason 2 Always present during maintenance or upgrades.

Impact:

• Impact 1 Reduced readability and auditability.

• Impact 2 Misconfiguration risk leading to unintended reward ranges (e.g., if only one number is updated).

Proof of Concept

If developers later decide to change rewards to 50–250, they must update both 100 and 401. Missing one update would create an unintended range.

Recommended Mitigation

Define named constants for reward parameters and reference them instead of magic numbers.