Normal behavior: Battles should require meaningful economic stakes to prevent spam and ensure participant commitment.
The specific issue: The protocol only validates bet equality but not minimum amounts, allowing zero or dust-value bets that cost more in gas than reward value, enabling economic griefing attacks.
Likelihood:
Attackers can easily automate zero-bet battle spam with minimal setup cost
No economic barriers prevent repeated exploitation
Players may accidentally set meaningless bet amounts
Impact:
Network congestion from spam battle transactions
Economic griefing where gas costs exceed battle rewards
Poor user experience with meaningless zero-value battles
Blockchain resource waste through pointless transactions
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.
The contest is complete and the rewards are being distributed.