The burnFaucetTokens function currently performs a token transfer from the contract to the owner, followed by a burn, but lacks an event emission that explicitly signals that a faucet burn occurred.
This can disrupt off-chain tracking, auditability, and user experience, as external observers may not easily recognize that a token burn has taken place through this specific function.
Likelihood:
If _transfer and _burn emit Transfer events, the lack of a custom event in burnFaucetTokens has minimal impact, as the necessary information is already logged.
If _transfer or _burn do not emit events, the likelihood of issues increases, as off-chain applications cannot track the transfer or burn operations.
Impact:
Without events, off-chain applications may fail to track token transfers or burns, leading to reduced transparency and potential user confusion.
Lack of a clear, custom event makes it difficult for dApps, analytics tools, and indexers to distinguish burns from ordinary transfers.
Events serve as a critical mechanism for logging significant state changes on the blockchain, enabling off-chain applications to monitor and reflect these changes accurately.
For burn operations, a Transfer event to the zero address is a standard practice in ERC20 contracts, ensuring that token supply reductions are visible and verifiable.
A custom TokensBurned event would provide explicit context, making it easier for indexers and analytics platforms to differentiate burn operations from regular transfers, enhancing user trust and system transparency.
Add a dedicated event such as TokensBurned and emit it within the function to clearly indicate when a faucet burn occurs. This improves traceability and off-chain integration clarity.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.