The function getOneDayTimeDelay is documented as returning a “no time delay constant”. However, the actual implementation returns the constant ONE_DAY_TIME_DELAY, which semantically represents a one-day delay, not the absence of a delay.
This creates a discrepancy between the documentation and the function’s real behavior. Developers or integrators relying on the comments may misunderstand the purpose of the function or incorrectly assume it returns a zero or “no delay” value.
While this issue does not directly introduce a security vulnerability, misleading documentation can cause confusion, incorrect assumptions during integration, and potential logical errors in systems that depend on accurate time-delay parameters.
A developer reads the NatSpec comment and assumes the function returns a value representing no delay.
The function instead returns ONE_DAY_TIME_DELAY.
The returned value is used in logic that depends on timing assumptions, leading to unexpected behavior.
Update the NatSpec documentation to accurately reflect the function’s behavior. For example:
Change the description to explicitly state that the function returns a one-day time delay constant, or
Rename the function or comments to align with the intended meaning.
Keeping documentation consistent with implementation improves code clarity and reduces the risk of integration mistakes.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.
The contest is complete and the rewards are being distributed.