The contract allows proposing and executing transactions but does not provide any mechanism to cancel or delete a proposed transaction that hasn't been executed yet.
Once a transaction is proposed, it remains in the contract's storage forever, even if it becomes obsolete or unwanted. This could lead to storage bloat and potential confusion about which transactions are active.
Likelihood:
When a transaction is proposed but later determined to be unnecessary or incorrect
Storage accumulates old, obsolete transactions that will never be executed
Impact:
Storage bloat over time with unused transactions
Potential confusion about which transactions are actively being considered
No way to clean up malicious or erroneous transaction proposals
Minor gas inefficiency from unused storage
==================================================================================
The contract does not implement any upgrade mechanism (such as proxy pattern) or emergency pause functionality.
If a critical vulnerability is discovered after deployment, there is no way to pause operations or upgrade the contract logic to fix the issue. All funds would need to be migrated to a new contract manually.
Likelihood:
When a critical vulnerability is discovered post-deployment
When the contract needs to be upgraded with new features or fixes
During emergency situations requiring immediate action
Impact:
No ability to pause contract operations during an emergency
Cannot upgrade contract logic if vulnerabilities are found
Must deploy entirely new contract and migrate funds manually
Users must trust that no critical bugs exist since there's no recovery mechanism
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.
The contest is complete and the rewards are being distributed.