ContestManager is supposed to provide an observable record of contest lifecycle actions — creation, funding, and closure — so frontends, indexers, and monitoring systems can react to state changes without polling on-chain storage.
No events are declared or emitted anywhere in ContestManager. Every call to createContest, fundContest, and closeContest changes critical protocol state with no on-chain log. Off-chain systems must resort to polling getContests() every block or parsing ERC20 Transfer events as a proxy, which is brittle and incomplete.
Likelihood:
Every call to createContest, fundContest, and closeContest produces this gap — 100% of contest lifecycle actions are unlogged. This affects every deployment and every operator of the protocol.
Impact:
Frontends cannot display a real-time feed of new or closed contests without expensive storage polling on every block.
There is no immutable on-chain audit trail for owner actions — when a contest was created, funded, or closed cannot be determined from logs alone.
Monitoring and alerting systems have no hook to detect funding events or suspicious close activity.
Record all logs across a full contest lifecycle and verify that none are emitted by ContestManager — only the underlying ERC20 Transfer events appear.
All recorded logs have emitter != conMan, confirming ContestManager emits nothing across its entire lifecycle.
Declare events for each lifecycle action and emit them at the appropriate points in createContest, fundContest, and _closeContest.
**Description** The `ContestManager` contract lacks event emissions for critical actions such as creating, funding, and closing contests. Events are crucial in Solidity contracts for logging important actions, as they provide an immutable record on the blockchain that can be indexed and queried by off-chain applications. Without these events, tracking the state and history of the contract becomes difficult, which can hinder monitoring, debugging, and auditing efforts. **Impact** - **Visibility**: Without events, external parties (such as users or monitoring systems) cannot easily track when contests are created, funded, or closed. This lack of visibility can lead to difficulties in verifying the correct operation of the contract. - **Debugging**: Developers and auditors will find it more challenging to diagnose issues or verify contract behavior without event logs. In the event of a bug or issue, the absence of events makes it harder to trace the sequence of actions leading up to the problem. - **Transparency**: Participants in the contests might not have a clear understanding of the state of the contract, which could lead to mistrust or uncertainty. **Proof of Concepts** The following functions in the `ContestManager` contract are identified as lacking event emissions: - `createContest` - `fundContest` - `closeContest` For example, in the `createContest` function: ```solidity function createContest(address[] memory players, uint256[] memory rewards, IERC20 token, uint256 totalRewards) public onlyOwner returns (address) { Pot pot = new Pot(players, rewards, token, totalRewards); contests.push(address(pot)); contestToTotalRewards[address(pot)] = totalRewards; // No event emitted to signal that a new contest has been created. return address(pot); } ``` **Recommended Mitigation:** Add event declarations and emit statements in the contract to log significant actions. ```solidity event ContestCreated(address indexed contestAddress, uint256 totalRewards); event ContestFunded(address indexed contestAddress, uint256 amount); event ContestClosed(address indexed contestAddress); ```
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
Submissions are being reviewed by our AI judge. Results will be available in a few minutes.
View all submissionsThe contest is complete and the rewards are being distributed.