Rust Fund

AI First Flight #9
Beginner FriendlyRust
EXP
View results
Submission Details
Severity: medium
Valid

Deadline Flag Never Set Allows Unlimited Deadline Modifications

Root + Impact

Root Cause: The set_deadline function checks dealine_set flag but never sets it to true after updating the deadline.

Impact: Creators can modify campaign deadlines unlimited times, manipulating refund windows and trapping contributor funds indefinitely.

Description

Normal behavior: Once a campaign deadline is established, it should be immutable to protect contributor expectations. The dealine_set flag exists to enforce this one-time setting rule.

Issue: The function checks if dealine_set is true but never actually sets the flag to true after updating the deadline, making the check completely useless.
pub fn set_deadline(ctx: Context<FundSetDeadline>, deadline: u64) -> Result<()> {
let fund = &mut ctx.accounts.fund;
if fund.dealine_set {
return Err(ErrorCode::DeadlineAlreadySet.into());
}
fund.deadline = deadline;
// @> Root cause: Missing `fund.dealine_set = true;`
// @> Flag remains false, allowing unlimited deadline changes
Ok(())
}

Risk

Likelihood:HIGH

  • Reason 1:

    Every call to set_deadline succeeds because dealine_set permanently remains false after initialization

  • Reason 2:
    No external conditions prevent repeated execution; any creator can exploit this on any campaign they own

Impact:HIGH

  • Impact 1:Creators can extend deadlines indefinitely, permanently preventing contributors from claiming refunds on failed campaigns

  • Impact 2:Creators can unexpectedly shorten deadlines, violating contributor expectations and campaign terms

Proof of Concept

// 1. Creator sets deadline to 7 days
set_deadline(ctx, now + 604800)?;
// fund.dealine_set still equals false
// 2. Contributors contribute 50 SOL expecting 7-day campaign
contribute(ctx, 50_000_000_000)?;
// 3. Near deadline, goal not met - creator extends to 1 year
set_deadline(ctx, now + 31536000)?; // Succeeds! Flag still false
// 4. Contributors can never refund - deadline never "passes"

The creator first sets a 7-day deadline, then later changes it to 1 year. Since dealine_set flag is never set to true, the check if fund.dealine_set always passes. Contributors expecting the original deadline are trapped because the creator can indefinitely extend the campaign, preventing refunds forever.

Recommended Mitigation

pub fn set_deadline(ctx: Context<FundSetDeadline>, deadline: u64) -> Result<()> {
let fund = &mut ctx.accounts.fund;
+ let clock = Clock::get()?;
if fund.dealine_set {
return Err(ErrorCode::DeadlineAlreadySet.into());
}
+ require!(deadline > clock.unix_timestamp as u64, ErrorCode::DeadlineInPast);
+
fund.deadline = deadline;
+ fund.dealine_set = true;
Ok(())
}

Add fund.dealine_set = true after setting the deadline. This ensures the flag is properly updated, making subsequent set_deadline calls fail with DeadlineAlreadySet error. Additionally, validate the deadline is in the future to prevent past-timestamp exploits.

Updates

Lead Judging Commences

ai-first-flight-judge Lead Judge 9 days ago
Submission Judgement Published
Validated
Assigned finding tags:

[M-02] The set_deadline function does not set the dealine_set flag to true

The `set_deadline()` function in the `rustfund` program contains a vulnerability that allows campaign creators to manipulate deadlines indefinitely. While the function correctly checks if `fund.dealine_set` is true before allowing the deadline to be changed, it never sets this flag to true after setting the deadline. ```rust pub fn set_deadline(ctx: Context<FundSetDeadline>, deadline: u64) -> Result<()> { let fund = &mut ctx.accounts.fund; if fund.dealine_set { return Err(ErrorCode::DeadlineAlreadySet.into()); } fund.deadline = deadline; Ok(()) } ``` The function is missing a crucial line to update the flag: `fund.dealine_set = true;` This oversight bypasses a key safeguard intended to prevent creators from manipulating deadlines after they've been set. According to the project documentation, this flag is meant to enforce deadline immutability, which is an essential part of the platform's trust model. ### Impact 1. **Refund evasion**: Creators can prevent users from obtaining refunds by continually extending the deadline whenever it approaches. This directly undermines the project's advertised "Refund Mechanism" which promises that "Contributors can get refunds if deadlines are reached and goals aren't met." 2. **Fund locking**: Contributors' funds can be effectively locked indefinitely, as the refund function is contingent upon the deadline being reached: ```rust if ctx.accounts.fund.deadline != 0 && ctx.accounts.fund.deadline > Clock::get().unwrap().unix_timestamp.try_into().unwrap() { return Err(ErrorCode::DeadlineNotReached.into()); } ``` ### Proof of Concept (PoC) The following test demonstrates how a creator can set the deadline multiple times, effectively bypassing the intended deadline immutability: ```javascript import * as anchor from "@coral-xyz/anchor"; import { Program } from "@coral-xyz/anchor"; import { Rustfund } from "../target/types/rustfund"; import { assert } from "chai"; describe("VULN-02: set_deadline vulnerability", () => { // Configures the provider to use the local cluster const provider = anchor.AnchorProvider.env(); anchor.setProvider(provider); const program = anchor.workspace.Rustfund as Program<Rustfund>; // Test variables const fundName = "TestFund"; const description = "Testing deadline vulnerability"; const goal = new anchor.BN(1000000); let fundPda: anchor.web3.PublicKey; it("Allows you to modify the deadline several times", async () => { // Derivation of PDA address for financing account [fundPda] = await anchor.web3.PublicKey.findProgramAddress( [Buffer.from(fundName), provider.wallet.publicKey.toBuffer()], program.programId ); // Fund creation await program.rpc.fundCreate(fundName, description, goal, { accounts: { fund: fundPda, creator: provider.wallet.publicKey, systemProgram: anchor.web3.SystemProgram.programId, }, }); // First deadline assignment const deadline1 = new anchor.BN(Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + 3600); // 1 hour in the future await program.rpc.setDeadline(deadline1, { accounts: { fund: fundPda, creator: provider.wallet.publicKey, }, }); // Second deadline assignment (which should not be possible if the flag is set to true) const deadline2 = new anchor.BN(Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + 7200); // 2 hours into the future await program.rpc.setDeadline(deadline2, { accounts: { fund: fundPda, creator: provider.wallet.publicKey, }, }); // Check that the deadline has been updated to the second value const fundAccount = await program.account.fund.fetch(fundPda); assert.ok( fundAccount.deadline.eq(deadline2), "The deadline may have been modified several times, but vulnerability presents" ); }); }); ``` Save the above test as, for example, tests/02.ts in your project's test directory and run the test : ```Solidity anchor test ``` ### Concrete Impact Example To illustrate the real-world impact of this vulnerability, consider this scenario: - A creator launches a campaign to fund a project with a goal of 100 SOL - The creator sets an initial deadline of 30 days - Contributors collectively deposit 80 SOL (below the goal) - As the deadline approaches, the creator realizes they won't reach the goal - Instead of allowing refunds as promised, the creator extends the deadline by another 30 days - This pattern can repeat indefinitely, effectively locking contributor funds - Even if contributors try to request refunds, they'll be rejected with "DeadlineNotReached" errors ### Recommendation The fix for this vulnerability is straightforward. The `set_deadline()` function should be modified to set the `dealine_set` flag to true after setting the deadline: ```rust pub fn set_deadline(ctx: Context<FundSetDeadline>, deadline: u64) -> Result<()> { let fund = &mut ctx.accounts.fund; if fund.dealine_set { return Err(ErrorCode::DeadlineAlreadySet.into()); } fund.deadline = deadline; fund.dealine_set = true; // Add this line to fix the vulnerability Ok(()) } ```

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.

Give us feedback!