Rust Fund

AI First Flight #9
Beginner FriendlyRust
EXP
View results
Submission Details
Severity: medium
Valid

set_deadline

Root + Impact

Description

  • Describe the normal behavior in one or more sentences

  • Explain the specific issue or problem in one or more sentences

### Title
`set_deadline` missing state update allows creator to repeatedly reset deadline and block refunds
### Severity
High
### Scope
`programs/rustfund/src/lib.rs`
### Description
The `set_deadline` function (located at `lib.rs:55-63`) is designed to prevent a fund's deadline from being altered once initialized. It attempts to enforce this invariant by validating the state of the `fund.dealine_set` boolean flag.
However, the function completely lacks a state modification write back. After verifying that the flag is false and updating the `fund.deadline` value, it never sets `fund.dealine_set = true`.
As a result, the flag remains `false` permanently. This renders the `DeadlineAlreadySet` error check entirely dead code, granting the fund creator infinite control over the timeline.
### Risk Assessment
* **Fund Locking & Extension:** The creator can extend the campaign infinitely, permanently delaying refund availability for contributors.
* **Instant Fraudulent Withdrawals:** The creator can move the deadline to a past timestamp immediately after receiving a donation to force a premature withdrawal state.
* **Denial of Service (DoS):** If contributors attempt to claim refunds based on time criteria, the creator can dynamically reset the deadline to block their transactions.
### PoC
The following TypeScript test demonstrates that `setDeadline` can be called repeatedly without reverting:
```typescript
it("deadline can be set multiple times - flag never flips", async () => {
// 1. Create the fund
await program.methods.createFund(new anchor.BN(100 * LAMPORTS_PER_SOL))
.accounts({ creator: creator.publicKey, fund: fundPDA })
.signers([creator]).rpc();
// 2. Set the deadline the first time
await program.methods.setDeadline(new anchor.BN(Date.now() / 1000 + 100000))
.accounts({ creator: creator.publicKey, fund: fundPDA })
.signers([creator]).rpc();
// 3. Set the deadline a second time
// This action should revert with DeadlineAlreadySet, but it succeeds.
await program.methods.setDeadline(new anchor.BN(Date.now() / 1000 - 100))
.accounts({ creator: creator.publicKey, fund: fundPDA })
.signers([creator]).rpc();
// Verification: The deadline was overwritten successfully without errors.
});
```
### Mitigation
Explicitly flip the `dealine_set` flag to `true` inside the execution path right after assigning the new deadline value.
```rust
pub fn set_deadline(ctx: Context<FundSetDeadline>, deadline: u64) -> Result<()> {
let fund = &mut ctx.accounts.fund;
if fund.dealine_set {
return Err(ErrorCode::DeadlineAlreadySet.into());
}
fund.deadline = deadline;
fund.dealine_set = true; // <-- ADD THIS STATE UPDATE
Ok(())
}
```

Risk

Likelihood:

  • Reason 1 // Describe WHEN this will occur (avoid using "if" statements)

  • Reason 2

Impact:

  • Impact 1

  • Impact 2

Proof of Concept

Recommended Mitigation

- remove this code
+ add this code
Updates

Lead Judging Commences

ai-first-flight-judge Lead Judge 2 days ago
Submission Judgement Published
Validated
Assigned finding tags:

[M-02] The set_deadline function does not set the dealine_set flag to true

The `set_deadline()` function in the `rustfund` program contains a vulnerability that allows campaign creators to manipulate deadlines indefinitely. While the function correctly checks if `fund.dealine_set` is true before allowing the deadline to be changed, it never sets this flag to true after setting the deadline. ```rust pub fn set_deadline(ctx: Context<FundSetDeadline>, deadline: u64) -> Result<()> { let fund = &mut ctx.accounts.fund; if fund.dealine_set { return Err(ErrorCode::DeadlineAlreadySet.into()); } fund.deadline = deadline; Ok(()) } ``` The function is missing a crucial line to update the flag: `fund.dealine_set = true;` This oversight bypasses a key safeguard intended to prevent creators from manipulating deadlines after they've been set. According to the project documentation, this flag is meant to enforce deadline immutability, which is an essential part of the platform's trust model. ### Impact 1. **Refund evasion**: Creators can prevent users from obtaining refunds by continually extending the deadline whenever it approaches. This directly undermines the project's advertised "Refund Mechanism" which promises that "Contributors can get refunds if deadlines are reached and goals aren't met." 2. **Fund locking**: Contributors' funds can be effectively locked indefinitely, as the refund function is contingent upon the deadline being reached: ```rust if ctx.accounts.fund.deadline != 0 && ctx.accounts.fund.deadline > Clock::get().unwrap().unix_timestamp.try_into().unwrap() { return Err(ErrorCode::DeadlineNotReached.into()); } ``` ### Proof of Concept (PoC) The following test demonstrates how a creator can set the deadline multiple times, effectively bypassing the intended deadline immutability: ```javascript import * as anchor from "@coral-xyz/anchor"; import { Program } from "@coral-xyz/anchor"; import { Rustfund } from "../target/types/rustfund"; import { assert } from "chai"; describe("VULN-02: set_deadline vulnerability", () => { // Configures the provider to use the local cluster const provider = anchor.AnchorProvider.env(); anchor.setProvider(provider); const program = anchor.workspace.Rustfund as Program<Rustfund>; // Test variables const fundName = "TestFund"; const description = "Testing deadline vulnerability"; const goal = new anchor.BN(1000000); let fundPda: anchor.web3.PublicKey; it("Allows you to modify the deadline several times", async () => { // Derivation of PDA address for financing account [fundPda] = await anchor.web3.PublicKey.findProgramAddress( [Buffer.from(fundName), provider.wallet.publicKey.toBuffer()], program.programId ); // Fund creation await program.rpc.fundCreate(fundName, description, goal, { accounts: { fund: fundPda, creator: provider.wallet.publicKey, systemProgram: anchor.web3.SystemProgram.programId, }, }); // First deadline assignment const deadline1 = new anchor.BN(Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + 3600); // 1 hour in the future await program.rpc.setDeadline(deadline1, { accounts: { fund: fundPda, creator: provider.wallet.publicKey, }, }); // Second deadline assignment (which should not be possible if the flag is set to true) const deadline2 = new anchor.BN(Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + 7200); // 2 hours into the future await program.rpc.setDeadline(deadline2, { accounts: { fund: fundPda, creator: provider.wallet.publicKey, }, }); // Check that the deadline has been updated to the second value const fundAccount = await program.account.fund.fetch(fundPda); assert.ok( fundAccount.deadline.eq(deadline2), "The deadline may have been modified several times, but vulnerability presents" ); }); }); ``` Save the above test as, for example, tests/02.ts in your project's test directory and run the test : ```Solidity anchor test ``` ### Concrete Impact Example To illustrate the real-world impact of this vulnerability, consider this scenario: - A creator launches a campaign to fund a project with a goal of 100 SOL - The creator sets an initial deadline of 30 days - Contributors collectively deposit 80 SOL (below the goal) - As the deadline approaches, the creator realizes they won't reach the goal - Instead of allowing refunds as promised, the creator extends the deadline by another 30 days - This pattern can repeat indefinitely, effectively locking contributor funds - Even if contributors try to request refunds, they'll be rejected with "DeadlineNotReached" errors ### Recommendation The fix for this vulnerability is straightforward. The `set_deadline()` function should be modified to set the `dealine_set` flag to true after setting the deadline: ```rust pub fn set_deadline(ctx: Context<FundSetDeadline>, deadline: u64) -> Result<()> { let fund = &mut ctx.accounts.fund; if fund.dealine_set { return Err(ErrorCode::DeadlineAlreadySet.into()); } fund.deadline = deadline; fund.dealine_set = true; // Add this line to fix the vulnerability Ok(()) } ```

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.

Give us feedback!