configurePass overrites the current supply leading to incorrect accounting and minting of more tokens than intended
Root + Impact
Root Cause
The configurePass function resets the current minted supply (passSupply) to zero whenever it is called, regardless of previously minted tokens.
This breaks the invariant between:
passSupply(already minted tokens)passMaxSupply(maximum allowed supply)
Additionally, there is no restriction preventing maxSupply from being reduced below already minted supply, allowing inconsistent state and reminting.
Source:
Impact
Unlimited reminting beyond intended supply cap
ResettingpassSupplyallows minting up tomaxSupplyagain, effectively duplicating supplyViolation of scarcity guarantees
Previously minted passes are not accounted for, breaking trust in supply limitsInconsistent contract state
passSupplyno longer reflects actual circulating tokens
Description
Under normal behavior,
passSupplyshould track the total number of minted tokens and must never decrease. Additionally,passMaxSupplyshould only be increased (or remain unchanged) to preserve supply guarantees.In the current implementation, calling
configurePassresetspassSupplyto zero and allows arbitrary updates tomaxSupply. This enables reminting of already issued passes and breaks the integrity of supply accounting.
Risk
Likelihood:
Occurs whenever the organizer calls
configurePassafter passes have already been mintedLikely during reconfiguration or updates to pricing/supply parameters
Impact:
Total supply can exceed intended limits.
Incorrect accounting in passSupply mapping due to reset.
Recommended Mitigation
The value of max supply should not decrease it should only be increased, so to ensure the config's current supply remains intact.
Lead Judging Commences
[M-01] [H-1] Reseting the current pass supply to 0 in the FestivalPass::configurePass function allows users to bypass the max supply cap of a pass
# \[H-1] Reseting the current pass supply to `0` in the `FestivalPass::configurePass` function allows users to bypass the max supply cap of a pass ## Description: ```solidity function configurePass(uint256 passId, uint256 price, uint256 maxSupply) external onlyOrganizer { require(passId == GENERAL_PASS || passId == VIP_PASS || passId == BACKSTAGE_PASS, "Invalid pass ID"); require(price > 0, "Price must be greater than 0"); require(maxSupply > 0, "Max supply must be greater than 0"); passPrice[passId] = price; passMaxSupply[passId] = maxSupply; @> passSupply[passId] = 0; // Reset current supply } ``` If you reset `passSupply[passId]` to `0` in the `FestivalPass::configurePass` function after passes have been sold, the next buyer will be able to mint as if no passes have been sold. This allows the total minted passes to exceed `passMaxSupply`, which is a serious vulnerability (a supply cap bypass) ## Impact: * Supply caps become meaningless: The users can mint unlimited passes beyond the intended maximum supply * Pass scarcity and value are destroyed, affecting the economic model ## Proof of Concept: ```solidity function test_SupplyCapBypassVulnerability() public { // Step 1: Configure a pass with max supply of 2 vm.prank(organizer); festivalPass.configurePass(1, GENERAL_PRICE, 2); // Step 2: Buy 2 passes (reaching max supply) vm.prank(user1); festivalPass.buyPass{value: GENERAL_PRICE}(1); vm.prank(user2); festivalPass.buyPass{value: GENERAL_PRICE}(1); // Verify max supply reached assertEq(festivalPass.passSupply(1), 2); assertEq(festivalPass.passMaxSupply(1), 2); // Step 3: Try to buy another pass - should fail address user3 = makeAddr("user3"); vm.deal(user3, 10 ether); vm.prank(user3); vm.expectRevert("Max supply reached"); festivalPass.buyPass{value: GENERAL_PRICE}(1); // Step 4: VULNERABILITY - Organizer reconfigures the pass // This resets passSupply[1] to 0, bypassing the supply cap! vm.prank(organizer); festivalPass.configurePass(1, GENERAL_PRICE, 2); // Step 5: Now we can buy more passes even though max supply was already reached vm.prank(user3); festivalPass.buyPass{value: GENERAL_PRICE}(1); // Step 6: We can even buy more passes beyond the original max supply vm.deal(user4, 10 ether); vm.prank(user4); festivalPass.buyPass{value: GENERAL_PRICE}(1); // Step 7: Verify the vulnerability - total supply exceeds max supply assertEq(festivalPass.passSupply(1), 2); // Current supply counter assertEq(festivalPass.passMaxSupply(1), 2); // Max supply limit // But we actually have 4 passes minted in total! assertEq(festivalPass.balanceOf(user1, 1), 1); assertEq(festivalPass.balanceOf(user2, 1), 1); assertEq(festivalPass.balanceOf(user3, 1), 1); assertEq(festivalPass.balanceOf(user4, 1), 1); // Total minted: 4 passes, but max supply is only 2! uint256 totalMinted = festivalPass.balanceOf(user1, 1) + festivalPass.balanceOf(user2, 1) + festivalPass.balanceOf(user3, 1) + festivalPass.balanceOf(user4, 1); assertGt(totalMinted, festivalPass.passMaxSupply(1), "VULNERABILITY: Total minted exceeds max supply!"); } ``` ## Recommended Mitigation: The `passSupply` reset should be removed ```diff function configurePass(uint256 passId, uint256 price, uint256 maxSupply) external onlyOrganizer { require(passId == GENERAL_PASS || passId == VIP_PASS || passId == BACKSTAGE_PASS, "Invalid pass ID"); require(price > 0, "Price must be greater than 0"); require(maxSupply > 0, "Max supply must be greater than 0"); passPrice[passId] = price; passMaxSupply[passId] = maxSupply; - passSupply[passId] = 0; } ```
Rewards breakdown
Live
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
Judging
Submissions are being reviewed by our AI judge. Results will be available in a few minutes.
View all submissionsRewards Distribution
The contest is complete and the rewards are being distributed.