Beatland Festival

AI First Flight #4
Beginner FriendlyFoundrySolidityNFT
EXP
View results
Submission Details
Severity: medium
Valid

redeemMemorabilia mints via ERC1155 _mint whose onERC1155Received callback enables reentrancy that corrupts collection supply accounting

Reentrancy in redeemMemorabilia via ERC1155 callback disrupts edition and supply accounting

Description

redeemMemorabilia burns BEAT (FestivalPass.sol:197), increments currentItemId (line 200), then calls _mint (line 207). Although currentItemId++ runs before the mint, the ERC1155 _mint invokes the redeemer's onERC1155Received callback, which can re-enter redeemMemorabilia. Each re-entrant call performs another burnFrom + mint and is bounded only by the strict currentItemId < maxSupply check (line 194), so a contract redeemer can drive redemption recursively and manipulate accounting at the supply boundary.

require(collection.currentItemId < collection.maxSupply, "Collection sold out");
BeatToken(beatToken).burnFrom(msg.sender, collection.priceInBeat);
uint256 itemId = collection.currentItemId++;
_mint(msg.sender, tokenId, 1, ""); // @> callback re-enters redeemMemorabilia

Risk

Likelihood:

Low. The attacker must hold enough BEAT to fund each burned redemption, and the callback path is contract-only. But the reentrancy is unconditionally reachable by any contract redeemer with a balance.

Impact:

Medium. With no reentrancy guard, redemptions stack within one transaction in an order that the contract does not anticipate, letting an attacker race the currentItemId < maxSupply boundary and mint edition tokens at unintended boundary states. This corrupts the per-edition accounting and undermines the integrity of the memorabilia supply, even though currentItemId is incremented pre-mint.

Proof of Concept

A contract with sufficient BEAT re-enters from onERC1155Received, performing nested burn+mint redemptions in a single call.

function onERC1155Received(address,address,uint256,uint256,bytes calldata) external returns (bytes4) {
if (n > 0) { n--; pass.redeemMemorabilia(collectionId); }
return this.onERC1155Received.selector;
}
// each nested call burns priceInBeat and mints another edition at the boundary

Recommended Mitigation

Add a reentrancy guard and keep strict CEI so the mint cannot trigger a nested redemption.

- function redeemMemorabilia(uint256 collectionId) external {
+ function redeemMemorabilia(uint256 collectionId) external nonReentrant {
Updates

Lead Judging Commences

ai-first-flight-judge Lead Judge about 4 hours ago
Submission Judgement Published
Validated
Assigned finding tags:

[M-02] Function `FestivalPass:buyPass` Lacks Defense Against Reentrancy Attacks, Leading to Exceeding the Maximum NFT Pass Supply

# Function `FestivalPass:buyPass` Lacks Defense Against Reentrancy Attacks, Leading to Exceeding the Maximum NFT Pass Supply ## Description * Under normal circumstances, the system should control the supply of tokens or resources to ensure that it does not exceed a predefined maximum limit. This helps maintain system stability, security, and predictable behavior. * The function `FestivalPass:buyPass` does not follow the **Checks-Effects-Interactions** pattern. If a user uses a malicious contract as their account and includes reentrancy logic, they can bypass the maximum supply limit. ```solidity function buyPass(uint256 collectionId) external payable { // Must be valid pass ID (1 or 2 or 3) require(collectionId == GENERAL_PASS || collectionId == VIP_PASS || collectionId == BACKSTAGE_PASS, "Invalid pass ID"); // Check payment and supply require(msg.value == passPrice[collectionId], "Incorrect payment amount"); require(passSupply[collectionId] < passMaxSupply[collectionId], "Max supply reached"); // Mint 1 pass to buyer @> _mint(msg.sender, collectionId, 1, ""); // question: potential reentrancy? ++passSupply[collectionId]; // VIP gets 5 BEAT welcome bonus, BACKSTAGE gets 15 BEAT welcome bonus uint256 bonus = (collectionId == VIP_PASS) ? 5e18 : (collectionId == BACKSTAGE_PASS) ? 15e18 : 0; if (bonus > 0) { // Mint BEAT tokens to buyer BeatToken(beatToken).mint(msg.sender, bonus); } emit PassPurchased(msg.sender, collectionId); } ``` ## Risk **Likelihood**: * If a user uses a contract wallet with reentrancy logic, they can trigger multiple malicious calls during the execution of the `_mint` function. **Impact**: * Although the attacker still pays for each purchase, the total number of minted NFTs will exceed the intended maximum supply. This can lead to supply inflation and user dissatisfaction. ## Proof of Concept ````Solidity //SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity 0.8.25; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC1155/IERC1155Receiver.sol"; import "../src/FestivalPass.sol"; import "./FestivalPass.t.sol"; import {console} from "forge-std/Test.sol"; contract AttackBuyPass{ address immutable onlyOnwer; FestivalPassTest immutable festivalPassTest; FestivalPass immutable festivalPass; uint256 immutable collectionId; uint256 immutable configPassPrice; uint256 immutable configPassMaxSupply; uint256 hackMintCount = 0; constructor(FestivalPassTest _festivalPassTest, FestivalPass _festivalPass, uint256 _collectionId, uint256 _configPassPrice, uint256 _configPassMaxSupply) payable { onlyOnwer = msg.sender; festivalPassTest = _festivalPassTest; festivalPass = _festivalPass; collectionId = _collectionId; configPassPrice = _configPassPrice; configPassMaxSupply = _configPassMaxSupply; hackMintCount = 1; } receive() external payable {} fallback() external payable {} function DoAttackBuyPass() public { require(msg.sender == onlyOnwer, "AttackBuyPass: msg.sender != onlyOnwer"); // This attack can only bypass the "maximum supply" restriction. festivalPass.buyPass{value: configPassPrice}(collectionId); } function onERC1155Received( address operator, address from, uint256 id, uint256 value, bytes calldata data ) external returns (bytes4){ if (hackMintCount festivalPass.passMaxSupply(targetPassId)); } } ``` ```` ## Recommended Mitigation * Refactor the function `FestivalPass:buyPass` to follow the **Checks-Effects-Interactions** principle. ```diff function buyPass(uint256 collectionId) external payable { // Must be valid pass ID (1 or 2 or 3) require(collectionId == GENERAL_PASS || collectionId == VIP_PASS || collectionId == BACKSTAGE_PASS, "Invalid pass ID"); // Check payment and supply require(msg.value == passPrice[collectionId], "Incorrect payment amount"); require(passSupply[collectionId] < passMaxSupply[collectionId], "Max supply reached"); // Mint 1 pass to buyer - _mint(msg.sender, collectionId, 1, ""); ++passSupply[collectionId]; + emit PassPurchased(msg.sender, collectionId); + _mint(msg.sender, collectionId, 1, ""); // VIP gets 5 BEAT welcome bonus, BACKSTAGE gets 15 BEAT welcome bonus uint256 bonus = (collectionId == VIP_PASS) ? 5e18 : (collectionId == BACKSTAGE_PASS) ? 15e18 : 0; if (bonus > 0) { // Mint BEAT tokens to buyer BeatToken(beatToken).mint(msg.sender, bonus); } - emit PassPurchased(msg.sender, collectionId); } ```

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.

Give us feedback!