Beatland Festival

AI First Flight #4
Beginner FriendlyFoundrySolidityNFT
EXP
View results
Submission Details
Severity: medium
Valid

`configurePass` resets sold supply while existing passes remain minted

Root + Impact

Description

The normal behavior should enforce each pass type's maximum supply against the total number of currently minted passes. Reconfiguring price or max supply should not erase already sold passes from supply accounting.

configurePass() resets passSupply[passId] to zero every time it is called. Existing ERC1155 passes are not burned. If the organizer reconfigures a pass after sales, the contract forgets the already minted supply and can sell more passes than the intended maxSupply.

function configurePass(
uint256 passId,
uint256 price,
uint256 maxSupply
) external onlyOrganizer {
require(passId == GENERAL_PASS || passId == VIP_PASS || passId == BACKSTAGE_PASS, "Invalid pass ID");
require(price > 0, "Price must be greater than 0");
require(maxSupply > 0, "Max supply must be greater than 0");
passPrice[passId] = price;
passMaxSupply[passId] = maxSupply;
// @> Resets accounting even though existing ERC1155 passes remain minted
passSupply[passId] = 0;
}
function buyPass(uint256 collectionId) external payable {
require(collectionId == GENERAL_PASS || collectionId == VIP_PASS || collectionId == BACKSTAGE_PASS, "Invalid pass ID");
require(msg.value == passPrice[collectionId], "Incorrect payment amount");
// @> Uses the reset counter rather than actual ERC1155 supply
require(passSupply[collectionId] < passMaxSupply[collectionId], "Max supply reached");
_mint(msg.sender, collectionId, 1, "");
++passSupply[collectionId];
}

Risk

Likelihood:

  • This occurs when the organizer reconfigures a pass type after users have already bought passes.

  • This occurs during normal operational updates such as changing a price or correcting a max supply.

Impact:

  • The protocol can sell more passes than the configured maximum supply.

  • Scarcity guarantees for VIP or backstage passes can be broken, harming users who paid for limited access.

Proof of Concept

function testConfigurePassResetAllowsOverselling() public {
address alice = makeAddr("alice");
address bob = makeAddr("bob");
vm.deal(alice, 1 ether);
vm.deal(bob, 1 ether);
vm.prank(organizer);
festivalPass.configurePass(3, BACKSTAGE_PRICE, 1);
vm.prank(alice);
festivalPass.buyPass{value: BACKSTAGE_PRICE}(3);
assertEq(festivalPass.balanceOf(alice, 3), 1);
assertEq(festivalPass.passSupply(3), 1);
vm.prank(organizer);
festivalPass.configurePass(3, BACKSTAGE_PRICE, 1);
assertEq(festivalPass.passSupply(3), 0);
vm.prank(bob);
festivalPass.buyPass{value: BACKSTAGE_PRICE}(3);
assertEq(festivalPass.balanceOf(alice, 3), 1);
assertEq(festivalPass.balanceOf(bob, 3), 1);
assertEq(festivalPass.passMaxSupply(3), 1);
}

Recommended Mitigation

Do not reset passSupply during reconfiguration. If reducing max supply, require the new maximum to be at least the already sold supply.

function configurePass(
uint256 passId,
uint256 price,
uint256 maxSupply
) external onlyOrganizer {
require(passId == GENERAL_PASS || passId == VIP_PASS || passId == BACKSTAGE_PASS, "Invalid pass ID");
require(price > 0, "Price must be greater than 0");
require(maxSupply > 0, "Max supply must be greater than 0");
+ require(maxSupply >= passSupply[passId], "Max supply below minted supply");
passPrice[passId] = price;
passMaxSupply[passId] = maxSupply;
- passSupply[passId] = 0; // Reset current supply
}
Updates

Lead Judging Commences

ai-first-flight-judge Lead Judge about 2 hours ago
Submission Judgement Published
Validated
Assigned finding tags:

[M-01] [H-1] Reseting the current pass supply to 0 in the FestivalPass::configurePass function allows users to bypass the max supply cap of a pass

# \[H-1] Reseting the current pass supply to `0` in the `FestivalPass::configurePass` function allows users to bypass the max supply cap of a pass ## Description: ```solidity function configurePass(uint256 passId, uint256 price, uint256 maxSupply) external onlyOrganizer { require(passId == GENERAL_PASS || passId == VIP_PASS || passId == BACKSTAGE_PASS, "Invalid pass ID"); require(price > 0, "Price must be greater than 0"); require(maxSupply > 0, "Max supply must be greater than 0"); passPrice[passId] = price; passMaxSupply[passId] = maxSupply; @> passSupply[passId] = 0; // Reset current supply } ``` If you reset `passSupply[passId]` to `0` in the `FestivalPass::configurePass` function after passes have been sold, the next buyer will be able to mint as if no passes have been sold. This allows the total minted passes to exceed `passMaxSupply`, which is a serious vulnerability (a supply cap bypass) ## Impact: * Supply caps become meaningless: The users can mint unlimited passes beyond the intended maximum supply * Pass scarcity and value are destroyed, affecting the economic model ## Proof of Concept: ```solidity function test_SupplyCapBypassVulnerability() public { // Step 1: Configure a pass with max supply of 2 vm.prank(organizer); festivalPass.configurePass(1, GENERAL_PRICE, 2); // Step 2: Buy 2 passes (reaching max supply) vm.prank(user1); festivalPass.buyPass{value: GENERAL_PRICE}(1); vm.prank(user2); festivalPass.buyPass{value: GENERAL_PRICE}(1); // Verify max supply reached assertEq(festivalPass.passSupply(1), 2); assertEq(festivalPass.passMaxSupply(1), 2); // Step 3: Try to buy another pass - should fail address user3 = makeAddr("user3"); vm.deal(user3, 10 ether); vm.prank(user3); vm.expectRevert("Max supply reached"); festivalPass.buyPass{value: GENERAL_PRICE}(1); // Step 4: VULNERABILITY - Organizer reconfigures the pass // This resets passSupply[1] to 0, bypassing the supply cap! vm.prank(organizer); festivalPass.configurePass(1, GENERAL_PRICE, 2); // Step 5: Now we can buy more passes even though max supply was already reached vm.prank(user3); festivalPass.buyPass{value: GENERAL_PRICE}(1); // Step 6: We can even buy more passes beyond the original max supply vm.deal(user4, 10 ether); vm.prank(user4); festivalPass.buyPass{value: GENERAL_PRICE}(1); // Step 7: Verify the vulnerability - total supply exceeds max supply assertEq(festivalPass.passSupply(1), 2); // Current supply counter assertEq(festivalPass.passMaxSupply(1), 2); // Max supply limit // But we actually have 4 passes minted in total! assertEq(festivalPass.balanceOf(user1, 1), 1); assertEq(festivalPass.balanceOf(user2, 1), 1); assertEq(festivalPass.balanceOf(user3, 1), 1); assertEq(festivalPass.balanceOf(user4, 1), 1); // Total minted: 4 passes, but max supply is only 2! uint256 totalMinted = festivalPass.balanceOf(user1, 1) + festivalPass.balanceOf(user2, 1) + festivalPass.balanceOf(user3, 1) + festivalPass.balanceOf(user4, 1); assertGt(totalMinted, festivalPass.passMaxSupply(1), "VULNERABILITY: Total minted exceeds max supply!"); } ``` ## Recommended Mitigation: The `passSupply` reset should be removed ```diff function configurePass(uint256 passId, uint256 price, uint256 maxSupply) external onlyOrganizer { require(passId == GENERAL_PASS || passId == VIP_PASS || passId == BACKSTAGE_PASS, "Invalid pass ID"); require(price > 0, "Price must be greater than 0"); require(maxSupply > 0, "Max supply must be greater than 0"); passPrice[passId] = price; passMaxSupply[passId] = maxSupply; - passSupply[passId] = 0; } ```

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.

Give us feedback!