Normal behavior: delisting a token should stop NEW deposits/loans while existing LPs keep the ability to withdraw their principal.
The issue: setAllowedToken(token, false) only deletes the s_tokenToAssetToken mapping (ThunderLoan.sol:240). Every exit path — redeem() and flashloan() — is guarded by revertIfNotAllowedToken, which reverts once the mapping is gone (ThunderLoan.sol:161-178 / 121-126). The existing AssetToken keeps holding all deposited underlying, but LPs have no self-service way to get it back. Re-listing the token deploys a brand-new EMPTY AssetToken (exchange rate reset to 1e18), orphaning the old shares entirely.
Lifecycle check (required for delist-type admin actions): where does existing user state go? Nowhere. Is there a compensation/migration path? None.
Likelihood: Medium.
Reason 1: Triggers when the owner delists a token — the allowed=false branch is a deliberate, built-in protocol feature (the function ships with it), and token support rotation is normal operations; no admin mistake is required beyond using the feature as designed.
Reason 2: Requires the token to actually hold LP funds at delist time; for unused tokens the impact is zero.
Impact:
Impact 1: 100% of the delisted token's LP principal is permanently locked in the orphaned AssetToken contract (no owner sweep function exists either).
Impact 2: Re-listing does not restore access — old shares are stranded on the deleted AssetToken address while the new one starts empty, permanently splitting accounting.
Foundry test: test/poc/PocDelistBrick.t.sol (PoC file added under test/poc/ in the contest repo). LP deposits 1,000e18 tokenA; owner delists the token:
Actual vs expected: redeem() reverts after delist (ThunderLoan__NotAllowedToken) — expected withdrawal of 1,000e18, actual 0; after re-listing the LP holds zero shares on the new AssetToken.
Allow exits for delisted tokens (block only new entry), or migrate funds before deleting the mapping:
Minimal alternative: keep a s_delistedTokenToAssetToken registry written on delist, and have redeem() fall back to it.Root + Impact
Describe the normal behavior in one or more sentences
Explain the specific issue or problem in one or more sentences
Likelihood:
Reason 1 // Describe WHEN this will occur (avoid using "if" statements)
Reason 2
Impact:
Impact 1
Impact 2
## Description If the 'ThunderLoan::setAllowedToken' function is called with the intention of setting an allowed token to false and thus deleting the assetToken to token mapping; nobody would be able to redeem funds of that token in the 'ThunderLoan::redeem' function and thus have them locked away without access. ## Vulnerability Details If the owner sets an allowed token to false, this deletes the mapping of the asset token to that ERC20. If this is done, and a liquidity provider has already deposited ERC20 tokens of that type, then the liquidity provider will not be able to redeem them in the 'ThunderLoan::redeem' function. ```solidity function setAllowedToken(IERC20 token, bool allowed) external onlyOwner returns (AssetToken) { if (allowed) { if (address(s_tokenToAssetToken[token]) != address(0)) { revert ThunderLoan__AlreadyAllowed(); } string memory name = string.concat("ThunderLoan ", IERC20Metadata(address(token)).name()); string memory symbol = string.concat("tl", IERC20Metadata(address(token)).symbol()); AssetToken assetToken = new AssetToken(address(this), token, name, symbol); s_tokenToAssetToken[token] = assetToken; emit AllowedTokenSet(token, assetToken, allowed); return assetToken; } else { AssetToken assetToken = s_tokenToAssetToken[token]; @> delete s_tokenToAssetToken[token]; emit AllowedTokenSet(token, assetToken, allowed); return assetToken; } } ``` ```solidity function redeem( IERC20 token, uint256 amountOfAssetToken ) external revertIfZero(amountOfAssetToken) @> revertIfNotAllowedToken(token) { AssetToken assetToken = s_tokenToAssetToken[token]; uint256 exchangeRate = assetToken.getExchangeRate(); if (amountOfAssetToken == type(uint256).max) { amountOfAssetToken = assetToken.balanceOf(msg.sender); } uint256 amountUnderlying = (amountOfAssetToken * exchangeRate) / assetToken.EXCHANGE_RATE_PRECISION(); emit Redeemed(msg.sender, token, amountOfAssetToken, amountUnderlying); assetToken.burn(msg.sender, amountOfAssetToken); assetToken.transferUnderlyingTo(msg.sender, amountUnderlying); } ``` ## Impact The below test passes with a ThunderLoan\_\_NotAllowedToken error. Proving that a liquidity provider cannot redeem their deposited tokens if the setAllowedToken is set to false, Locking them out of their tokens. ```solidity function testCannotRedeemNonAllowedTokenAfterDepositingToken() public { vm.prank(thunderLoan.owner()); AssetToken assetToken = thunderLoan.setAllowedToken(tokenA, true); tokenA.mint(liquidityProvider, AMOUNT); vm.startPrank(liquidityProvider); tokenA.approve(address(thunderLoan), AMOUNT); thunderLoan.deposit(tokenA, AMOUNT); vm.stopPrank(); vm.prank(thunderLoan.owner()); thunderLoan.setAllowedToken(tokenA, false); vm.expectRevert(abi.encodeWithSelector(ThunderLoan.ThunderLoan__NotAllowedToken.selector, address(tokenA))); vm.startPrank(liquidityProvider); thunderLoan.redeem(tokenA, AMOUNT_LESS); vm.stopPrank(); } ``` ## Recommendations It would be suggested to add a check if that assetToken holds any balance of the ERC20, if so, then you cannot remove the mapping. ```diff function setAllowedToken(IERC20 token, bool allowed) external onlyOwner returns (AssetToken) { if (allowed) { if (address(s_tokenToAssetToken[token]) != address(0)) { revert ThunderLoan__AlreadyAllowed(); } string memory name = string.concat("ThunderLoan ", IERC20Metadata(address(token)).name()); string memory symbol = string.concat("tl", IERC20Metadata(address(token)).symbol()); AssetToken assetToken = new AssetToken(address(this), token, name, symbol); s_tokenToAssetToken[token] = assetToken; emit AllowedTokenSet(token, assetToken, allowed); return assetToken; } else { AssetToken assetToken = s_tokenToAssetToken[token]; + uint256 hasTokenBalance = IERC20(token).balanceOf(address(assetToken)); + if (hasTokenBalance == 0) { delete s_tokenToAssetToken[token]; emit AllowedTokenSet(token, assetToken, allowed); + } return assetToken; } } ```
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
Submissions are being reviewed by our AI judge. Results will be available in a few minutes.
View all submissionsThe contest is complete and the rewards are being distributed.