A code redundancy issue has been identified in the contract where a tautological check is performed. Specifically, the contract checks if _diff is greater than zero after already verifying that _balance is greater than balance, making the second check redundant and unnecessary.
The contract contains a sequence of conditions where it first checks if _balance is greater than balance. If this condition is true, it calculates the difference as _diff = _balance - balance. Immediately after, it checks if _diff is greater than zero. Given the initial condition, this second check is tautological and will always be true. Therefore, the check for _diff > 0 is redundant and can be safely removed.
The redundant check can lead to unnecessary gas consumption, albeit minimal, during contract execution.
Manual Review
Remove the redundant check if (_diff > 0) from the contract.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.