Lack of Handling for Potential TWAP Issues in Circuit Breaker Mechanism
The baseOracleCircuitBreaker function uses the Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP) as a fallback when there are issues with the Chainlink oracle data. However, it doesn't handle potential issues with the TWAP itself. If the TWAP is manipulated or incorrect due to issues in the underlying Uniswap pool, it could lead to incorrect pricing information.
It could potentially impact the contract's functionality and accuracy of data
Manual
To resolve this issue, consider implementing additional checks and fallback mechanisms to handle potential anomalies in the TWAP.
Implement a sanity check for the TWAP price: This could involve comparing the TWAP price against a range of acceptable values. If the TWAP price falls outside this range, the function could revert or fall back to another pricing mechanism.
Use multiple sources for TWAP: Instead of relying solely on Uniswap, consider fetching TWAP from multiple decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and use the median or average value. This can help mitigate the risk of manipulation or anomalies in a single DEX.
Implement a fallback mechanism: In case both Chainlink and TWAP prices are found to be invalid or manipulated, consider having a fallback mechanism. This could be a trusted external oracle or a governance vote to manually set the price.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.