Is a bad practice to use assert()
to create a revert, instead of require()
.
Prior to solidity version 0.8.0, hitting an assert consumes the remainder of the transaction's available gas rather than returning it, as require()/revert() do. assert() should be avoided even past solidity version 0.8.0 as its documentation states that "The assert function creates an error of type Panic(uint256). ... Properly functioning code should never create a Panic, not even on invalid external input. If this happens, then there is a bug in your contract which you should fix".
Instances (3)
Bad practice that goes against solidity docs good practices.
Manual review, Solidity docs
Replace assert assumptions with require.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.