The purpose of the contract is to "store a private password that others won't be able to see", but this is fundamentally flawed logic because nothing is private on the blockchain.
When the owner calls setPassword(), this function call will be visible in the mempool and everyone will be able to see the argument parsed into the function, therefore everyone will be able to know the password.
The owner thinks that his password is privately stored in the contract, when in fact it is public information.
Manual review
Don't use a public blockchain to store private information.
Private functions and state variables are only visible for the contract they are defined in and not in derived contracts. In this case private doesn't mean secret/confidential
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.