The enterRaffle function in the provided smart contract contains a potential vulnerability related to inefficient loop handling, which can lead to excessively high gas costs and possible Denial of Service (DoS) attacks.
The function allows multiple new players to be added to the players array through a single transaction. However, it performs a nested loop check for duplicate addresses. This nested loop results in quadratic time complexity (O(n²)), where n is the number of players. As the size of the players array grows, the gas cost for executing this function will increase significantly, potentially exceeding block gas limits and making the function unusable.
The impact of this inefficient loop handling includes:
High Gas Costs: Users may incur prohibitively high gas fees when the players array grows large.
Denial of Service: Malicious actors could exploit this vulnerability to perform a DoS attack by deliberately calling the function with numerous players, causing transactions to fail due to excessive gas costs.
Reduced Contract Usability: The contract's raffle feature may become unusable as the players array grows, impacting the overall functionality.
manual
To mitigate this issue, the following recommendations are provided:
Efficient Duplicate Check: Implement a more efficient way to check for duplicate entries, such as using a mapping to track addresses that have already entered the raffle.
Limit Player Count: Consider setting a reasonable limit on the number of new players that can be entered in a single transaction.
Regular Testing: Conduct regular tests and audits, especially after making changes to the contract logic.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.