The liquidateVault
function in the SmartVaultManagerV5
contract lacks reentrancy protection, posing a potential vulnerability to reentrancy attacks. Leading to potential loss of funds.
The vulnerability arises from the absence of a reentrancy protection mechanism in the liquidateVault
function, allowing an external contract to recursively call it during execution.
Unintended State Changes: This Reentrancy attacks can interfere with the normal flow of the liquidateVault function, leading to unintended changes in the contract's state. This may include altering variables, updating status flags, or disrupting the expected sequence of operations.
Loss of Funds: If the liquidateVault function involves financial transactions, such as transferring assets or handling funds, a successful reentrancy attack could lead to the unauthorized withdrawal or manipulation of funds. This poses a direct risk to the financial integrity of the contract and its users.
Inconsistent Contract Behavior: Reentrancy attacks may introduce inconsistencies in the contract's behavior. This could result in scenarios where the contract's state is uncertain or contradictory, making it challenging for users to rely on the expected outcomes of certain functions.
Manual Code Review
Implement the ReentrancyGuard pattern in the liquidateVault
function to prevent reentrancy attacks. This involves using the ReentrancyGuardUpgradeable
contract from OpenZeppelin.
ReentrancyGuardUpgradeable
here ensures that the liquidateVault
function is protected against reentrancy attacks, enhancing the security of the smart contract.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.