The claimRewards function in the LiquidationPool contract lacks a proper reentrancy guard, which could expose the contract to potential reentrancy attacks. Reentrancy attacks can occur when an external contract calls back into the contract being executed, leading to unexpected behavior and potential security vulnerabilities.
The claimRewards function is susceptible to reentrancy attacks due to the absence of a reentrancy guard. The function iterates through a list of tokens and transfers rewards to the user. Without a reentrancy guard, a malicious external contract could repeatedly call the claimRewards function, potentially interrupting its execution and causing unexpected state changes.
The absence of a reentrancy guard exposes the contract to potential reentrancy attacks, allowing malicious actors to manipulate the contract's state and possibly disrupt its intended functionality. This could result in loss of funds or other unexpected consequences.
Manual
Implement a reentrancy guard to protect the claimRewards function. Use a boolean variable to track the reentrancy status and a modifier to ensure that the function cannot be reentered until its execution is complete. Here is an example of a reentrancy guard:
Apply the noReentrant modifier to the claimRewards function to prevent reentrancy during its execution:
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.