The Standard

The Standard
DeFiHardhat
20,000 USDC
View results
Submission Details
Severity: low
Invalid

Unchecked External Calls in `swap` Function

Summary

The swap function performs unchecked external calls in both native and ERC20 token scenarios, which may lead to unexpected behavior and potential exploits.

Vulnerability Details

function swap(bytes32 _inToken, bytes32 _outToken, uint256 _amount) external onlyOwner {
uint256 swapFee = _amount * ISmartVaultManagerV3(manager).swapFeeRate() / ISmartVaultManagerV3(manager).HUNDRED_PC();
address inToken = getSwapAddressFor(_inToken);
uint256 minimumAmountOut = calculateMinimumAmountOut(_inToken, _outToken, _amount);
ISwapRouter.ExactInputSingleParams memory params = ISwapRouter.ExactInputSingleParams({
tokenIn: inToken,
tokenOut: getSwapAddressFor(_outToken),
fee: 3000,
recipient: address(this),
deadline: block.timestamp,
amountIn: _amount - swapFee,
amountOutMinimum: minimumAmountOut,
sqrtPriceLimitX96: 0
});
inToken == ISmartVaultManagerV3(manager).weth() ?
executeNativeSwapAndFee(params, swapFee) :
executeERC20SwapAndFee(params, swapFee);
}

Impact

Unchecked external calls can result in unexpected behavior and potential exploits.

The "Unchecked External Calls in swap Function" vulnerability refers to the lack of proper validation and handling of external calls made within the swap function. This vulnerability can pose a significant risk to the contract's security due to potential unexpected behavior and exploits. Let's break down the risks associated with unchecked external calls in the swap function:

Reentrancy attacks occur when an external contract can call back into the SmartVaultV3 contract during the execution of the swap function.
Without proper checks and precautions, an attacker could manipulate the flow of execution and potentially execute malicious code during the external calls.
This could lead to unauthorized withdrawals, manipulation of internal state variables, or other unintended consequences.
Failure of External Calls:

External calls, especially to other contracts, can fail for various reasons, such as out-of-gas exceptions or issues in the external contract's code.
The swap function does not currently check whether the external calls are successful, leaving the contract vulnerable to potential failures.
In the case of a failed external call, the swap function might not revert its state to the correct state, leading to inconsistencies in the contract's state.
Loss of Funds:

If an external call is intended to transfer funds, the lack of proper checks for success could result in funds being lost or stuck in an inconsistent state.
In the worst case, this could lead to a situation where the contract loses control over its assets or fails to distribute assets as intended.
Unexpected Behavior:

Unchecked external calls can lead to unexpected behavior in the contract, making it challenging to predict the outcome of certain operations.
This lack of predictability can be exploited by attackers to create scenarios that benefit them while causing harm to the contract or its users.

Tools Used

Manual

Recommendations

Ensure that external calls are checked for success, and handle potential reentrancy issues. To address the "Unchecked External Calls in swap Function" vulnerability, it is recommended to implement the following mitigation steps:

Use the ReentrancyGuard pattern or similar mechanisms to prevent reentrancy attacks.
Check for the success of external calls using the return values and handle failures appropriately.
Implement proper error handling to revert the state in case of external call failures.
Consider using established libraries like OpenZeppelin's ReentrancyGuard to enhance security.

Updates

Lead Judging Commences

hrishibhat Lead Judge over 1 year ago
Submission Judgement Published
Invalidated
Reason: Non-acceptable severity
Assigned finding tags:

informational/invalid

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.