After reviewing the provided TokenManagerMock contract, I did not identify any high-severity security vulnerabilities. The contract primarily focuses on managing accepted tokens, providing functionality to add and remove tokens, and retrieving token information.
Here are some observations:
Access Control: The contract uses the Ownable pattern, restricting certain functions to be callable only by the owner. This is a common practice for managing administrative access.
Input Validation: The contract checks for the existence of a token before adding a new one to prevent duplicates. It also ensures that the native token (NATIVE) cannot be removed, which is essential for the contract's operation.
Error Handling: The contract uses custom errors, such as TokenExists, to revert transactions in case of specific issues, providing clear feedback on failure.
Use of Chainlink Feeds: The contract integrates with Chainlink feeds to obtain decimal information, ensuring consistency in token representations.
Visibility: The functions are appropriately marked as external or public, and state variables are properly encapsulated.
Overall, the provided TokenManagerMock contract appears to be well-constructed, with no evident high-severity security vulnerabilities. However, it's crucial to consider the broader context of the entire system and how this contract interacts with others for a comprehensive security assessment.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.