Summary

This findings report outlines two low-risk errors identified during the code review:

The revert statement within the calcGaugePoints function on line 199 of LibGauge.sol.
The revert statement within the beanDenominatedValue function on line 449 of LibTokenSilo.sol.

Vulnerability Details

1. calcGaugePoints function in LibGauge.sol (Line 199):
   In the calcGaugePoints function at line 199 of LibGauge.sol, a revert statement is identified. Further analysis reveals that this revert statement could potentially lead to unexpected behavior or undesired outcomes. A more informative error message and additional context could enhance the clarity of the code.

2. beanDenominatedValue function in LibTokenSilo.sol (Line 449):
   In the beanDenominatedValue function at line 449 of LibTokenSilo.sol, a revert statement is identified. Similar to the previous case, providing more context and a detailed error message can aid developers in understanding the reason for the revert.

Impact

Both instances are considered low-risk, as they may not directly compromise the security of the contract. However, the lack of detailed information in the revert statements could hinder debugging efforts and make it challenging for developers to identify the root cause of unexpected conditions.

Tools Used

The findings were identified through manual code review and analysis. No specific automated tools were used for this assessment.

Recommendations

Improve Error Messages:
Enhance the revert statements in the calcGaugePoints and beanDenominatedValue functions with informative error messages, providing specific details about the unexpected conditions or reasons for the reverts. This will assist developers in diagnosing issues more effectively.