This report presents the results of my audit of the Soulmate project's smart contracts. The audit revealed several areas for improvement and potential security concerns that should be addressed.
Description: The length of the niceWords
array is computed within a loop, which could be optimized by caching the length outside of the loop.
File: Soulmate.sol
Line: 119
Description: Long revert strings in the code suggest room for improvement in gas efficiency.
File: Soulmate.sol
Line: 21
Description: Arithmetic operations could be replaced with bitwise shift operations for better performance.
Files: Airdrop.sol
and Soulmate.sol
Lines: 20, 140
Description: Potentially unsafe ERC20 operations, such as transferFrom
, should be reviewed for security risks.
Files: Airdrop.sol
and Staking.sol
Relevant Lines: Multiple instances
Description: The compiler version specified in the pragma statements is broad, which could lead to unintended consequences with future compiler versions.
Files: Various
Relevant Lines: First lines of each file
These issues could affect the overall efficiency and security of the smart contracts. Addressing them is crucial to ensure the contracts operate as intended and to protect users' assets.
The audit was conducted using c4udit, a tool designed to identify common issues in Ethereum smart contracts.
Implement array and loop optimizations to minimize gas usage.
Review and condense revert strings to lower transaction costs.
Replace arithmetic operations with bitwise shift operations where applicable.
Thoroughly review ERC20 operations to ensure security.
Specify a more precise compiler version in pragma statements to prevent future compatibility issues.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.