Tadle
Tadle
DeFiFoundry
27,750 USDC
View results
Previous Next
Submission Details
Severity: low
Valid

`PreMarkets.createOffer()` uses an incorrect `offerId`.

bladesec

Summary

In createOffer(), offerId is increased before updating necessary info.

Vulnerability Details

In createOffer(), after checking the info existance, it increases offerId before setting the info.

address makerAddr = GenerateAddress.generateMakerAddress(offerId); //@audit unincreased
address offerAddr = GenerateAddress.generateOfferAddress(offerId);
address stockAddr = GenerateAddress.generateStockAddress(offerId);
​
if (makerInfoMap[makerAddr].authority != address(0x0)) {
revert MakerAlreadyExist();
}
​
if (offerInfoMap[offerAddr].authority != address(0x0)) {
revert OfferAlreadyExist();
}
​
if (stockInfoMap[stockAddr].authority != address(0x0)) {
revert StockAlreadyExist();
}
​
offerId = offerId + 1; //@audit increasing
​
offerInfoMap[offerAddr] = OfferInfo({
id: offerId, //@audit increased
authority: _msgSender(),
maker: makerAddr,
offerStatus: OfferStatus.Virgin,
offerType: params.offerType,
points: params.points,
amount: params.amount,
collateralRate: params.collateralRate,
abortOfferStatus: AbortOfferStatus.Initialized,
usedPoints: 0,
tradeTax: 0,
settledPoints: 0,
settledPointTokenAmount: 0,
settledCollateralAmount: 0
});
​
/// @dev update stock info
stockInfoMap[stockAddr] = StockInfo({
id: offerId, //@audit increased
stockStatus: StockStatus.Initialized,
stockType: params.offerType == OfferType.Ask
? StockType.Bid
: StockType.Ask,
authority: _msgSender(),
maker: makerAddr,
preOffer: address(0x0),
offer: offerAddr,
points: params.points,
amount: params.amount
});

Inconsistently, createTaker() increases offerId after updating stock info which is correct.

Impact

offerInfoMap and stockInfoMap will have an incorrect offerId after calling createOffer().

Tools Used

Manual Review

Recommendations

createOffer() should increase offerId after updating all info.

- offerId = offerId + 1;
​
offerInfoMap[offerAddr] = OfferInfo({
id: offerId,
authority: _msgSender(),
maker: makerAddr,
offerStatus: OfferStatus.Virgin,
offerType: params.offerType,
points: params.points,
amount: params.amount,
collateralRate: params.collateralRate,
abortOfferStatus: AbortOfferStatus.Initialized,
usedPoints: 0,
tradeTax: 0,
settledPoints: 0,
settledPointTokenAmount: 0,
settledCollateralAmount: 0
});
​
/// @dev update stock info
stockInfoMap[stockAddr] = StockInfo({
id: offerId,
stockStatus: StockStatus.Initialized,
stockType: params.offerType == OfferType.Ask
? StockType.Bid
: StockType.Ask,
authority: _msgSender(),
maker: makerAddr,
preOffer: address(0x0),
offer: offerAddr,
points: params.points,
amount: params.amount
});
​
+ offerId = offerId + 1;
Updates

Lead Judging Commences

0xnevi Lead Judge over 1 year ago
Submission Judgement Published
Validated
Assigned finding tags:

finding-PreMarkets-createOffer-offerId-increment-after

I believe this is valid low severity, although there is inconsistency here when using the correct `offerId` for assigning offerIds and generating the unique addresses as seen [here](https://github.com/Cyfrin/2024-08-tadle/blob/04fd8634701697184a3f3a5558b41c109866e5f8/src/core/PreMarkets.sol#L67-L69), this is purely an accounting error for offerIds. If we generate the offerId using current `offerId - 1`, the appropriate listing/taker orders can still be created against those offers.

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.

Give us feedback!