Note, #148, #826, #1784 all stems from the fact that order statuses are not appropriately updated when a taker order is created against a maker offer. If the status is switched to `Ongoing/Filled` respectively, the virgin checks will fail appropriately and subsequently all this issues will be fixed. They could possibly be duplicates, so leaving open for appeal. This actually is closely related to issue #148. If a taker has created an Bid/Ask offer agains a original maker offer and the Status is adjusted to Ongoing/Filled accordingly, then this wrong refund won't occur, so could be duplicates, given only Virgin orders can be aborted (same applies for canceled orders, since only virgin orders are supposed to be able to be canceled). Since the status update is incorrect, then if a virgin order that is partially filled is aborted, the collateral is not returned correctly even though the order is not settled, causing a loss of funds to makers.

Note, #148, #826, #1784 all stems from the fact that order statuses are not appropriately updated when a taker order is created against a maker offer. If the status is switched to `Ongoing/Filled` respectively, the virgin checks will fail appropriately and subsequently all this issues will be fixed. They could possibly be duplicates, so leaving open for appeal. This actually is closely related to issue #148. If a taker has created an Bid/Ask offer agains a original maker offer and the Status is adjusted to Ongoing/Filled accordingly, then this wrong refund won't occur, so could be duplicates, given only Virgin orders can be aborted (same applies for canceled orders, since only virgin orders are supposed to be able to be canceled). Since the status update is incorrect, then if a virgin order that is partially filled is aborted, the collateral is not returned correctly even though the order is not settled, causing a loss of funds to makers.