There is no option for a Taker of an Ask offer to claim compensation from a Maker if the Maker did not settle the Ask offer and the current market status is BidSettling.
The Takers' funds are locked in the system, and the only way to extract them is through direct Owner intervention, which is not guaranteed to occur.
If the Maker did not settle, the only way for the Takers to be refunded and compensated is through an Owner call to the DeliveryPlace.settleAskMaker() function:
This situation is not ideal, as there should be a direct way for a Taker of an Ask offer to settle the trade and receive compensation when the marketplace is in the BidSettling state.
Denial of Service (DoS) in claiming compensation for the Taker of an Ask offer.
Manual review.
Allow the Taker of an Ask offer to call for the settlement of an unsettled Ask offer if the marketplace is in the BidSettling state.
Invalid, the makers are incentivized to settle offers to earn maker bonuses when subsequent takers and makers make trade using the original collateral put up for points as well as get back their initial collateral. Additionally, if they do not settle on time, they will lose all their initial collateral, forcing the `owner` to come in and perform the settlement and retrieving that collateral. This is noted as a design decision [here](https://tadle.gitbook.io/tadle/how-tadle-works/features-and-terminologies/settlement-and-collateral-rate) If all else fails, the `owner` can come in to settle as seen [here](https://github.com/Cyfrin/2024-08-tadle/blob/04fd8634701697184a3f3a5558b41c109866e5f8/src/core/DeliveryPlace.sol#L254-L256) and [here](https://github.com/Cyfrin/2024-08-tadle/blob/04fd8634701697184a3f3a5558b41c109866e5f8/src/core/DeliveryPlace.sol#L365-L367) offers to allow closing offers and subsequently allowing refunds. I acknowledge that perhaps a more decentralized
Invalid, the makers are incentivized to settle offers to earn maker bonuses when subsequent takers and makers make trade using the original collateral put up for points as well as get back their initial collateral. Additionally, if they do not settle on time, they will lose all their initial collateral, forcing the `owner` to come in and perform the settlement and retrieving that collateral. This is noted as a design decision [here](https://tadle.gitbook.io/tadle/how-tadle-works/features-and-terminologies/settlement-and-collateral-rate) If all else fails, the `owner` can come in to settle as seen [here](https://github.com/Cyfrin/2024-08-tadle/blob/04fd8634701697184a3f3a5558b41c109866e5f8/src/core/DeliveryPlace.sol#L254-L256) and [here](https://github.com/Cyfrin/2024-08-tadle/blob/04fd8634701697184a3f3a5558b41c109866e5f8/src/core/DeliveryPlace.sol#L365-L367) offers to allow closing offers and subsequently allowing refunds. I acknowledge that perhaps a more decentralized
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.