The protocol is vulnerable to fee-on-transfer token within a smart contract,
where transactions involving a transfer-on-transfer operation consistently result in a revert.
This flaw rooted in the contract's logic, causes a Denial of Service (DoS) as it prevents successful execution
of token transfers.
Sponsor says:
ERC20 (any token that follows the ERC20 standard)
The issue arises due to the way the fee-on-transfer works, When the transfer function is called,
transfer-on-transfer tokens apply fee. However, due to a logical flaw or an unhandled edge case
in the _transfer, this transfer-on-transfer operation will always revert.
The exact line of code causing this issue could be related to:
This line: https://github.com/Cyfrin/2024-08-tadle/blob/main/src/core/TokenManager.sol#L259-L261
File: https://github.com/Cyfrin/2024-08-tadle/blob/main/src/core/TokenManager.sol#L233-L262
POC:
Result:
denial of Service when fee-on-transfer token used the transaction will revert.
Update code to be compatible with fee-on-transfer.
Valid medium, there are disruptions to the ability to take market actions. The following functions will be disrupted without the possibiliy of reaching settlement, since the respective offers cannot be created/listed regardless of mode when transferring collateral token required to the CapitalPool contract or when refunding token from user to capital pool during relisting. So withdrawal is not an issue - `createOffer()` - reverts [here](https://github.com/Cyfrin/2024-08-tadle/blob/04fd8634701697184a3f3a5558b41c109866e5f8/src/core/PreMarkets.sol#L96-L102) - `listOffer()` - reverts [here](https://github.com/Cyfrin/2024-08-tadle/blob/04fd8634701697184a3f3a5558b41c109866e5f8/src/core/PreMarkets.sol#L355-L362) - `relistOffer()` - reverts [here](https://github.com/Cyfrin/2024-08-tadle/blob/04fd8634701697184a3f3a5558b41c109866e5f8/src/core/PreMarkets.sol#L515-L521) - `createTaker()` - reverts [here](https://github.com/Cyfrin/2024-08-tadle/blob/04fd8634701697184a3f3a5558b41c109866e5f8/src/core/PreMarkets.sol#L831-L836) I believe medium severity is appropriate although the likelihood is high and impact is medium (only some level of disruption i.e. FOT tokens not supported and no funds at risk)
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.