Tadle

Tadle
DeFiFoundry
27,750 USDC
View results
Submission Details
Severity: low
Invalid

Token and User Whitelisting Privileges

Summary

The audit has identified that the contract owner has the ability to whitelist tokens or users. While this feature can be useful for managing privileges and access within the contract, it also presents risks if not properly controlled. An overly empowered owner with the ability to whitelist tokens or users can potentially misuse this privilege to grant unauthorized access or exemptions, which could lead to security issues or unfair advantages.


Vulnerability Details

  • Issue: The contract owner’s ability to whitelist tokens or users allows them to grant selective privileges, such as fee exemptions or special access to contract features. This privilege, if not well-guarded, can lead to unauthorized or inappropriate use of the contract's features.

  • Location:

    • File: /test/PreMarkets.t.sol

      • Line: 22

    • File: /src/interfaces/ITokenManager.sol

      • Line: 8

    • File: /src/core/TokenManager.sol

      • Line: 22

    • File: /src/storage/TokenManagerStorage.sol

      • Line: 13

Context:

  • PreMarketsTest: Test contract for the system configuration and token manager.

  • ITokenManager: Interface for the Token Manager, defining critical functions.

  • TokenManager: Implementation of the Token Manager contract.

  • TokenManagerStorage: Storage contract for the Token Manager, holding critical state variables.


Impact

  • Security Risk: If the owner's ability to whitelist is not properly controlled, it could result in unauthorized access or manipulation of contract features. This could undermine the integrity of the contract and expose it to potential attacks or misuse.

  • Misuse Potential: The owner could exploit their ability to whitelist to grant themselves or others undue advantages, such as bypassing fees or accessing restricted features.


Recommendations

  1. Limit Whitelisting Privileges:

    • Define Clear Use Cases: Ensure that the owner’s ability to whitelist tokens or users is strictly necessary and limited to well-defined, legitimate use cases. Avoid broad or ambiguous privilege grants.

    • Review Use Cases: Regularly review the reasons and contexts in which tokens or users are whitelisted to ensure they remain valid and necessary.

  2. Implement Strict Access Controls:

    • Access Control: Implement additional access control mechanisms to ensure that only authorized personnel can perform whitelisting actions. Consider using role-based access controls (RBAC) or multi-signature requirements for sensitive operations.

    • Audit Logging: Maintain detailed logs of all whitelisting actions, including who performed them and the rationale. This enhances transparency and accountability.

  3. Introduce Governance Mechanisms:

    • Governance: Consider incorporating a decentralized governance model where critical decisions, including whitelisting actions, require approval from multiple stakeholders.

    • Multi-Signature Wallet: Use a multi-signature wallet for executing whitelisting actions to distribute authority and reduce the risk of misuse.

  4. Regular Audits:

    • Periodic Review: Conduct regular audits to ensure that the whitelisting functionalities are not misused and that access controls remain effective.

    • Testing: Implement comprehensive testing to verify that the access controls and whitelisting mechanisms function as intended and cannot be bypassed.


Example of Updated Code

Before:

solidity

function whitelistToken(address token, bool isWhitelisted) external onlyOwner { _updateTokenWhitelisted(token, isWhitelisted); }

After:

solidity

// Example with Governance or Multi-Signature: function whitelistToken(address token, bool isWhitelisted) external onlyGovernance { _updateTokenWhitelisted(token, isWhitelisted); } // Note: Replace 'onlyGovernance' with your actual governance mechanism modifier.

Additional Security:

solidity

modifier onlyGovernance() { require(governance.isAuthorized(msg.sender), "Not authorized"); _; } // Governance contract should have logic for authorization


Conclusion

The ability of the contract owner to whitelist tokens or users needs to be carefully controlled to prevent misuse or unauthorized access. By limiting the scope of whitelisting privileges, implementing strict access controls, using governance mechanisms, and maintaining rigorous audit practices, you can significantly enhance the security and integrity of the contract. Regular reviews and updates to access controls will ensure that the contract remains secure and functional.

Updates

Lead Judging Commences

0xnevi Lead Judge about 1 year ago
Submission Judgement Published
Invalidated
Reason: Known issue
Assigned finding tags:

[invalid] finding-Admin-Errors-Malicious

The following issues and its duplicates are invalid as admin errors/input validation/malicious intents are1 generally considered invalid based on [codehawks guidelines](https://docs.codehawks.com/hawks-auditors/how-to-determine-a-finding-validity#findings-that-may-be-invalid). If they deploy/set inputs of the contracts appropriately, there will be no issue. Additionally admins are trusted as noted in READ.ME they can break certain assumption of the code based on their actions, and

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.