Tadle

Tadle
DeFiFoundry
27,750 USDC
View results
Submission Details
Severity: low
Invalid

Critical Administrative Functions

Summary

The audit has identified the presence of critical administrative functions within the smart contract. These functions can add, update, or delete owner/admin addresses and potentially compromise the contract’s security and transparency. It is essential to review and minimize these administrative functions to ensure that the contract remains efficient, secure, and transparent.


Vulnerability Details

  • Issue: The contract includes functions that can modify administrative roles or addresses. Such functions pose risks if they are not properly secured or if they provide excessive control to administrators, potentially leading to misuse or compromise.

  • Location: /src/utils/Rescuable.sol

  • Relevant Code: The contract inherits from Ownable and Pausable, which implies it may contain functions for managing ownership and contract state.


Impact

  • Security Risk: Critical administrative functions, if not secured properly, can lead to unauthorized access or control, allowing malicious actors to compromise the contract.

  • Transparency: Excessive administrative privileges may undermine the transparency of the contract, making it harder for users to trust the system.

  • Complexity: Managing administrative functions can increase the complexity of the contract, leading to potential inefficiencies and higher risk of bugs or vulnerabilities.


Recommendations

  1. Review Administrative Functions:

    • Audit Critical Functions: Identify all functions that add, update, or delete administrative addresses and review their necessity and security.

    • Minimize Functions: Limit administrative functions to only those essential for the contract’s operation. Avoid unnecessary complexity.

  2. Enhance Security:

    • Access Control: Ensure that functions managing critical administrative roles or addresses are secured with appropriate access control mechanisms, such as onlyOwner or role-based access control.

    • Function Restrictions: Use modifiers to restrict access to these functions to only authorized entities and avoid providing excessive control to any single entity.

  3. Transparency and Auditing:

    • Documentation: Clearly document the purpose and functionality of administrative functions to improve transparency.

    • Testing: Implement comprehensive testing to ensure that administrative functions cannot be exploited or misused.

  4. Code Refactoring:

    • Simplify: Refactor the contract to remove unnecessary administrative functions and streamline the contract's operations.

    • Security Reviews: Perform security reviews of the remaining administrative functions to ensure they adhere to best practices.


Fixed Code Example

Before:

solidity

// /src/utils/Rescuable.sol import {Ownable} from "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; import {Pausable} from "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Pausable.sol"; contract Rescuable is Ownable, Pausable { // Example of critical administrative function function addAdmin(address admin) external onlyOwner { // Implementation here } function removeAdmin(address admin) external onlyOwner { // Implementation here } function updateOwner(address newOwner) external onlyOwner { transferOwnership(newOwner); } }

After:

solidity

// /src/utils/Rescuable.sol import {Ownable} from "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; import {Pausable} from "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/Pausable.sol"; contract Rescuable is Ownable, Pausable { // Minimized critical administrative functions function pause() external onlyOwner { _pause(); } function unpause() external onlyOwner { _unpause(); } // Removed addAdmin, removeAdmin, and updateOwner functions }


Conclusion

Minimizing critical administrative functions within a smart contract is crucial for maintaining security, transparency, and efficiency. By reviewing and limiting these functions, securing them with appropriate access controls, and simplifying the contract’s operations, you can reduce the risk of vulnerabilities and ensure the contract operates as intended. Implement comprehensive testing and documentation to support these changes and verify the security of the updated contract.

Updates

Lead Judging Commences

0xnevi Lead Judge about 1 year ago
Submission Judgement Published
Invalidated
Reason: Known issue
Assigned finding tags:

[invalid] finding-Admin-Errors-Malicious

The following issues and its duplicates are invalid as admin errors/input validation/malicious intents are1 generally considered invalid based on [codehawks guidelines](https://docs.codehawks.com/hawks-auditors/how-to-determine-a-finding-validity#findings-that-may-be-invalid). If they deploy/set inputs of the contracts appropriately, there will be no issue. Additionally admins are trusted as noted in READ.ME they can break certain assumption of the code based on their actions, and

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.