stream recipient might need to keep stream solvent via deposit to sell the nft, the stream sender can unknowingly/maliciously void it to the direct detriment of the stream recipient.
Stream recipinet might need to sell stream NFT with solvency( to remain attractive) or use as collateral based on pre-agreed balance, and stream sender can arbitrarily impede this by calling void
which forfeits all uncovered debt.
In the sablier docs - under use cases, there are situations where streams can be used as collateral, and they buyer might need to increase the value of thier collateral by deposits which are impossible when the stream is voided. leaving an insolvent stream running does nothing to the sender, but voiding it only affects the recipient.
`Deposits cannot be made on voided streams`
Manual Review
Sender should not be able to singularaly void ream as it only affects the recipient.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.