A modifier intended to be invoked only once per transaction is being applied directly to a function without proper implementation, potentially allowing unintended state changes or reentrancy attacks.
Location: Line 77 in src/ChristmasDinner.sol
Type: Misuse of nonReentrant modifier
Description: The nonReentrant()
modifier is defined but not properly implemented in the contract.
Potential reentrancy vulnerabilities: Without proper implementation, functions could be called multiple times within a single transaction.
Unintended state changes: Malicious actors could exploit the lack of reentrancy protection to manipulate the contract's state.
Security risks: The contract may be more susceptible to various types of attacks, including those exploiting reentrancy vulnerabilities.
Slither static analysis tool identified this vulnerability.
Properly implement the nonReentrant modifier:
Apply the nonReentrant modifier to functions that are vulnerable to reentrancy attacks, typically those involving external calls or state changes.
Review all functions in the contract for potential reentrancy vulnerabilities and apply the nonReentrant modifier where appropriate.
Consider using OpenZeppelin's ReentrancyGuard library for consistent and battle-tested protection against reentrancy attacks:
Follow the Checks-Effects-Interactions pattern in your functions to further mitigate reentrancy risks.
Conduct a thorough security audit of the entire contract to identify any remaining vulnerabilities related to reentrancy or state manipulation.
By addressing this issue, you'll significantly improve the security posture of your smart contract by preventing potential reentrancy attacks and unintended state changes.
Found in src/ChristmasDinner.sol Line: 77
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
This is your time to appeal against judgements on your submissions.
Appeals are being carefully reviewed by our judges.