Beginner FriendlyFoundryNFT
100 EXP
View results
Submission Details
Severity: high
Valid

Insecure Randomness in selectWinner Function

Summary

The selectWinner function in the provided smart contract utilizes a flawed randomness generation method to determine the winner of a raffle. This insecure randomness generation approach is susceptible to manipulation by malicious actors, potentially allowing them to rig the lottery results and secure a win.

Vulnerability Details

The vulnerability in the selectWinner function is centered around the generation of winnerIndex. The function calculates the winnerIndex using the following code:

uint256 winnerIndex = uint256(keccak256(abi.encodePacked(msg.sender, block.timestamp, block.difficulty))) % players.length;

The issue with this approach is that it relies on easily predictable or manipulatable input data (e.g., msg.sender and block.timestamp) and uses a modulo operation to map the output to a winner. As a result, malicious participants with advanced knowledge of blockchain internals could manipulate these inputs to control the outcome of the raffle, effectively undermining its fairness.

Impact

  • Rigged Lottery Results: The vulnerability allows malicious individuals to manipulate the lottery results, leading to an unfair advantage and potential financial loss for other participants.

  • Loss of Trust: A compromised lottery undermines trust in the contract and may discourage future participation.

  • Financial Consequences: Financial resources allocated to the prize pool may be unfairly distributed to malicious actors.

Tools Used

manual

Recommendations

  • Secure Randomness Source: Implement a more secure and unpredictable source of randomness for selecting the winner. Consider using an external oracle, Chainlink VRF (Verifiable Random Function), or another proven solution for generating random numbers securely.

  • Third-party Auditing: Consider engaging a third-party auditor with expertise in randomness generation to review and ensure the fairness of the lottery.

  • Transparent Process: Clearly document and communicate the process for selecting the winner, so participants are aware of the fairness and security measures in place.

  • Testing: Thoroughly test the contract with various scenarios, including attempts to manipulate the lottery results, to identify any potential weaknesses.

Updates

Lead Judging Commences

Hamiltonite Lead Judge almost 2 years ago
Submission Judgement Published
Validated
Assigned finding tags:

weak-randomness

Root cause: bad RNG Impact: manipulate winner

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.