The Standard

The Standard
DeFiHardhat
20,000 USDC
View results
Submission Details
Severity: low
Invalid

Front-Running attacks and Timestamp Dependence, an attacker could manipulate the transaction order to exploit time-dependent conditions.

Summary

The deadline variable in the consolidatePendingStakes function is calculated using block.timestamp. This makes the function susceptible to front-running attacks, where an attacker could manipulate the transaction order to exploit time-dependent conditions.

Vulnerability Details

Code Snippet:

function consolidatePendingStakes() private {
uint256 deadline = block.number - (24 * 60 * 4); // Adjust the time period as needed
for (int256 i = int256(pendingStakes.length) - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
// Existing function logic...
}
}

The consolidatePendingStakes function in the LiquidationPool contract calculates the deadline variable using block.number. This reliance on block numbers to handle time dependencies introduces a vulnerability to front-running attacks, where an attacker could manipulate the transaction order to exploit time-dependent conditions.

Impact

The vulnerability introduces the risk of front-running attacks, compromising the integrity of the consolidatePendingStakes function by allowing attackers to manipulate transaction order and potentially gain advantages based on time-dependent conditions.

Tools Used

Manual Code Review

Recommendations

Implementing these recommendations, the LiquidationPool contract can enhance its resilience against front-running attacks and ensure more robust handling of time-dependent conditions.

To address the front-running and timestamp dependence vulnerability in the consolidatePendingStakes function of the LiquidationPool contract, the following recommendations are provided:

  1. Use Block Timestamp Instead of Block Number:

    • Consider using block.timestamp instead of block.number to calculate time-dependent variables. Using block timestamps provides a more accurate representation of time and reduces the risk of front-running attacks.

    uint256 deadline = block.timestamp - (24 * 60 * 4); // Adjust the time period as needed
  2. Explore Alternative Time Mechanisms:

    • Explore alternative mechanisms for handling time dependencies, such as block timestamps, oracles, or external time-related contracts. These alternatives can enhance the security of the contract by mitigating the risks associated with front-running.

  3. Adjust Time Period and Constants:

    • Ensure that the time period constants, such as 24 * 60 * 4, are appropriately adjusted based on the contract's requirements. Consider parameterizing these constants to allow for flexible adjustments without modifying the contract's code.

Updates

Lead Judging Commences

hrishibhat Lead Judge over 1 year ago
Submission Judgement Published
Invalidated
Reason: Non-acceptable severity
Assigned finding tags:

informational/invalid

0xVinylDavyl Submitter
over 1 year ago
hrishibhat Lead Judge
over 1 year ago
hrishibhat Lead Judge
over 1 year ago
hrishibhat Lead Judge over 1 year ago
Submission Judgement Published
Invalidated
Reason: Non-acceptable severity
Assigned finding tags:

informational/invalid

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.