Beginner FriendlyFoundryNFT
100 EXP
View results
Submission Details
Severity: medium
Valid

Users can be their own soulmate

Description: There is no check for whether the second soulmate's address is different from the first, therefore a user can mint two soulmate tokens.

Impact: The user will have double staking rate and airdrops.

Proof of Concept: Place the following in SoulmateTest.t.sol:

function test_SameUserIsSoulmate() public {
vm.startPrank(soulmate1);
soulmateContract.mintSoulmateToken();
soulmateContract.mintSoulmateToken();
vm.stopPrank();
assertTrue(soulmateContract.soulmateOf(soulmate1) == soulmate1);
}

Recommended Mitigation: Check if the address of the second soulmate differs from the first:

Code
function mintSoulmateToken() public returns (uint256) {
// Check if people already have a soulmate, which means already have a token
address soulmate = soulmateOf[msg.sender];
if (soulmate != address(0))
revert Soulmate__alreadyHaveASoulmate(soulmate);
address soulmate1 = idToOwners[nextID][0];
address soulmate2 = idToOwners[nextID][1];
if (soulmate1 == address(0)) {
idToOwners[nextID][0] = msg.sender;
ownerToId[msg.sender] = nextID;
emit SoulmateIsWaiting(msg.sender);
+ } else if (soulmate2 == address(0) && soulmate2 != soulmate1){
idToOwners[nextID][1] = msg.sender;
// Once 2 soulmates are reunited, the token is minted
ownerToId[msg.sender] = nextID;
soulmateOf[msg.sender] = soulmate1;
soulmateOf[soulmate1] = msg.sender;
idToCreationTimestamp[nextID] = block.timestamp;
emit SoulmateAreReunited(soulmate1, soulmate2, nextID);
_mint(msg.sender, nextID++);
}
Updates

Lead Judging Commences

0xnevi Lead Judge over 1 year ago
Submission Judgement Published
Validated
Assigned finding tags:

finding-self-soulmate

- Given the native anonymous nature of blockchain in general, this issue cannot be avoided unless an explicit whitelist is implemented. Even then we can only confirm soulmates are distinct individuals via kyc. I believe finding a soulmate is intended to be permisionless. - However, even though sufficient (500_000_000e18 in each vault) tokens are minted to claim staking and airdrop rewards, it would take 500_000_000 / 2 combined weeks for airdrop vault to be drained which is not unreasonable given there are [80+ million existing wallets](https://coinweb.com/trends/how-many-crypto-wallets-are-there/). Given there is no option to mint new love tokens, this would actually ruin the functionality of the protocol of finding soulmates and shift the focus to abusing a sybil attack to farming airdrops instead. Assigning medium severity for now but am open for appeals otherwise, since most if not all issues lack indepth analysis of the issue.

Support

FAQs

Can't find an answer? Chat with us on Discord, Twitter or Linkedin.